PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIMFX vs. RTHAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIMFX vs. RTHAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3 (HIMFX) and Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIMFX achieves a 2.57% return, which is significantly lower than RTHAX's 2.98% return.


HIMFX

1D
0.06%
1M
1.86%
YTD
2.57%
6M
3.09%
1Y
8.39%
3Y*
6.01%
5Y*
1.74%
10Y*

RTHAX

1D
0.10%
1M
2.12%
YTD
2.98%
6M
3.09%
1Y
6.87%
3Y*
4.46%
5Y*
0.60%
10Y*
2.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIMFX vs. RTHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HIMFX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3
2.57%4.69%6.23%7.89%-12.36%5.60%4.74%8.92%1.91%8.22%
RTHAX
Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund
2.98%2.11%4.49%7.78%-13.62%5.54%3.84%10.18%3.20%7.33%

Correlation

The correlation between HIMFX and RTHAX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.79

The correlation between HIMFX and RTHAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIMFX vs. RTHAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIMFX
HIMFX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
HIMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
HIMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

RTHAX
RTHAX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
RTHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
RTHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIMFX vs. RTHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3 (HIMFX) and Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HIMFXRTHAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.62

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

2.51

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.97

8.25

+2.72

HIMFX vs. RTHAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIMFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is comparable to the RTHAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIMFX and RTHAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HIMFX vs. RTHAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIMFX drawdown since its inception was -17.57%, smaller than the maximum RTHAX drawdown of -18.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMFX and RTHAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIMFXRTHAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.57%

-18.89%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-2.74%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.17%

-7.56%

+1.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.57%

-18.89%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.15%

-3.71%

+0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

0.83%

-0.06%

Volatility

HIMFX vs. RTHAX - Volatility Comparison

American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3 (HIMFX) and Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX) have volatilities of 0.76% and 0.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIMFXRTHAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.76%

0.74%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.22%

2.07%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.04%

2.88%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.82%

5.12%

-0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.59%

4.98%

-0.39%

HIMFX vs. RTHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIMFX has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than RTHAX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIMFX vs. RTHAX - Dividend Comparison

HIMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, which matches RTHAX's 4.20% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HIMFX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3
4.22%4.32%3.83%3.71%2.80%3.54%3.73%3.49%3.99%3.61%0.00%
RTHAX
Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund
4.20%3.60%4.02%3.97%3.64%2.80%3.10%3.83%3.86%3.44%4.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIMFX and RTHAX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIMFX has higher volatility (0.76%) compared to RTHAX (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIMFX dropped -17.57% vs RTHAX's -18.89%.

HIMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIMFX and RTHAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer