PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RTHAX vs. RTDYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RTHAX vs. RTDYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX) and Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund (RTDYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTHAX achieves a 1.95% return, which is significantly lower than RTDYX's 10.74% return. Over the past 10 years, RTHAX has underperformed RTDYX with an annualized return of 2.64%, while RTDYX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.91% annualized return.


RTHAX

1D
-0.31%
1M
-1.53%
6M
1.11%
YTD
1.95%
1Y
6.43%
3Y*
3.89%
5Y*
0.20%
10Y*
2.64%
ALL TIME*
3.16%

RTDYX

1D
1.54%
1M
0.42%
6M
9.25%
YTD
10.74%
1Y
21.47%
3Y*
17.92%
5Y*
12.08%
10Y*
13.91%
ALL TIME*
12.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RTHAX vs. RTDYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RTHAX
Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund
1.95%2.11%4.49%7.78%-13.62%5.54%3.84%10.18%3.20%8.19%
RTDYX
Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund
10.74%16.05%22.01%24.92%-16.48%27.22%13.88%30.27%-7.16%21.59%

Correlation

The correlation between RTHAX and RTDYX is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.08

The correlation between RTHAX and RTDYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RTHAX vs. RTDYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RTHAX
RTHAX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
RTHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
RTHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

RTDYX
RTDYX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
RTDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
RTDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RTHAX vs. RTDYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX) and Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund (RTDYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RTHAXRTDYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.28

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

2.31

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.29

9.94

+0.35

RTHAX vs. RTDYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTHAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is higher than the RTDYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTHAX and RTDYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RTHAX vs. RTDYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTHAX drawdown since its inception was -18.89%, smaller than the maximum RTDYX drawdown of -37.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTHAX and RTDYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RTHAXRTDYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.89%

-37.43%

+18.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.74%

-8.33%

+5.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.07%

-37.43%

+30.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.87%

-37.43%

+18.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.89%

-37.43%

+18.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

-4.70%

+3.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

-6.27%

+2.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

1.93%

-1.24%

Volatility

RTHAX vs. RTDYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX) is 1.03%, while Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund (RTDYX) has a volatility of 3.18%. This indicates that RTHAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RTDYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RTHAXRTDYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

3.18%

-2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.28%

9.58%

-7.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85%

12.33%

-9.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.14%

24.47%

-19.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.99%

22.09%

-17.10%

RTHAX vs. RTDYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RTHAX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than RTDYX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

RTHAX vs. RTDYX - Dividend Comparison

RTHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, less than RTDYX's 31.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RTDYX
Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund
31.53%35.18%31.60%4.66%6.03%6.51%3.44%6.62%11.47%7.65%1.79%2.57%
RTHAX
Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund
4.25%3.60%4.02%3.97%3.64%2.80%3.10%3.83%3.86%3.44%4.06%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RTHAX and RTDYX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RTDYX has higher volatility (3.18%) compared to RTHAX (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTHAX dropped -18.89% vs RTDYX's -37.43%.

RTHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RTHAX and RTDYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer