HIMCX vs. VMFGX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

HIMCX (Hartford MidCap HLS Fund) and VMFGX (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, HIMCX returned 8.42%/yr vs 11.68%/yr for VMFGX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HIMCX charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VMFGX.

Performance

HIMCX vs. VMFGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford MidCap HLS Fund (HIMCX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIMCX achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly lower than VMFGX's 19.43% return. Over the past 10 years, HIMCX has underperformed VMFGX with an annualized return of 8.42%, while VMFGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.68% annualized return.

HIMCX

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 1.60%
• YTD: 9.53%
• 6M: 7.10%
• 1Y: 9.21%
• 3Y*: 8.09%
• 5Y*: 0.55%
• 10Y*: 8.42%

VMFGX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 1.86%
• YTD: 19.43%
• 6M: 18.74%
• 1Y: 30.53%
• 3Y*: 18.60%
• 5Y*: 8.76%
• 10Y*: 11.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIMCX vs. VMFGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HIMCX Hartford MidCap HLS Fund	9.53%	-0.53%	6.32%	14.94%	-24.81%	10.22%	25.14%	32.64%	-7.51%	24.48%
VMFGX Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares	19.43%	7.43%	15.86%	17.42%	-18.99%	18.83%	22.61%	26.20%	-10.39%	19.87%

Correlation

The correlation between HIMCX and VMFGX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2012	0.95

The correlation between HIMCX and VMFGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HIMCX vs. VMFGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIMCX

HIMCX Risk / Return Rank: 7
HIMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
HIMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
HIMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
HIMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
HIMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

VMFGX

VMFGX Risk / Return Rank: 51
VMFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
VMFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
VMFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
VMFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
VMFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIMCX vs. VMFGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford MidCap HLS Fund (HIMCX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HIMCX	VMFGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.46	1.81	-1.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.79	2.59	-1.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.32	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.54	3.08	-2.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.61	12.26	-10.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HIMCX vs. VMFGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIMCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the VMFGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIMCX and VMFGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HIMCX	VMFGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46	1.81	-1.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03	0.43	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39	0.56	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	0.65	-0.53

Drawdowns

HIMCX vs. VMFGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIMCX drawdown since its inception was -50.83%, which is greater than VMFGX's maximum drawdown of -39.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMCX and VMFGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HIMCX	VMFGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.83%	-39.15%	-11.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.89%	-9.91%	-5.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.70%	-25.45%	-1.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.51%	-29.25%	-4.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.03%	-39.15%	+1.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.68%	0.00%	-2.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.96%	-5.70%	-4.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.30%	2.48%	+2.82%

Volatility

HIMCX vs. VMFGX - Volatility Comparison

Hartford MidCap HLS Fund (HIMCX) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFGX) at 4.98%. This indicates that HIMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMFGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HIMCX	VMFGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.26%	4.98%	+0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.78%	13.06%	+1.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.55%	16.82%	+1.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.66%	20.61%	+1.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.53%	21.05%	+0.48%

HIMCX vs. VMFGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIMCX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than VMFGX's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

HIMCX vs. VMFGX - Dividend Comparison

HIMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.85%, more than VMFGX's 0.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HIMCX Hartford MidCap HLS Fund	20.85%	22.84%	2.39%	7.25%	19.76%	18.32%	8.42%	16.22%	11.78%	4.61%	10.87%	13.33%
VMFGX Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares	0.59%	0.70%	0.84%	1.21%	1.12%	0.53%	0.79%	1.22%	1.18%	0.93%	1.14%	1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HIMCX and VMFGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, HIMCX and VMFGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, HIMCX or VMFGX?

HIMCX has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to VMFGX (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIMCX dropped -50.83% vs VMFGX's -39.15%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VMFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.