HIMCX vs. FMDGX
HIMCX (Hartford MidCap HLS Fund) and FMDGX (Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, HIMCX returned -0.30%/yr vs 5.27%/yr for FMDGX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HIMCX charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FMDGX.
Performance
HIMCX vs. FMDGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIMCX achieves a 3.62% return, which is significantly higher than FMDGX's 0.83% return.
HIMCX
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -5.24%
- 6M
- -0.95%
- YTD
- 3.62%
- 1Y
- -0.51%
- 3Y*
- 3.96%
- 5Y*
- -0.30%
- 10Y*
- 7.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.95%
FMDGX
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -2.32%
- YTD
- 0.83%
- 1Y
- -1.61%
- 3Y*
- 11.78%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.08%
HIMCX vs. FMDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIMCX Hartford MidCap HLS Fund | 3.62% | -0.53% | 6.32% | 14.94% | -24.81% | 10.22% | 25.14% | 3.73% |
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.83% | 8.60% | 22.03% | 25.79% | -26.67% | 12.67% | 34.84% | 4.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIMCX and FMDGX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.93 |
The correlation between HIMCX and FMDGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIMCX vs. FMDGX — Risk / Return Rank
HIMCX
FMDGX
HIMCX vs. FMDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford MidCap HLS Fund (HIMCX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HIMCX | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.00 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.02 | -0.07 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.05 | -0.20 | +0.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HIMCX vs. FMDGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIMCX drawdown since its inception was -50.83%, which is greater than FMDGX's maximum drawdown of -38.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMCX and FMDGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIMCX | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.83% | -38.59% | -12.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.89% | -14.75% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.70% | -25.30% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.51% | -38.59% | +5.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.93% | -5.98% | -1.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.94% | -11.05% | +1.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.42% | 5.16% | +0.26% |
Volatility
HIMCX vs. FMDGX - Volatility Comparison
Hartford MidCap HLS Fund (HIMCX) has a higher volatility of 6.36% compared to Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) at 5.15%. This indicates that HIMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIMCX | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.36% | 5.15% | +1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.32% | 13.83% | +2.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.92% | 17.36% | +2.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.89% | 22.52% | -0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.56% | 24.25% | -2.69% |
HIMCX vs. FMDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIMCX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FMDGX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIMCX vs. FMDGX - Dividend Comparison
HIMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.04%, more than FMDGX's 1.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund | 1.84% | 1.85% | 0.47% | 0.63% | 0.81% | 6.43% | 0.36% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HIMCX Hartford MidCap HLS Fund | 22.04% | 22.84% | 2.39% | 7.25% | 19.76% | 18.32% | 8.42% | 16.22% | 11.78% | 4.61% | 10.87% | 13.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, HIMCX and FMDGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
HIMCX has higher volatility (6.36%) compared to FMDGX (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIMCX dropped -50.83% vs FMDGX's -38.59%.
HIMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.01 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HIMCX and FMDGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer