HIMCX vs. FMDGX
HIMCX (Hartford MidCap HLS Fund) and FMDGX (Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, HIMCX returned 0.54%/yr vs 5.72%/yr for FMDGX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HIMCX charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FMDGX.
Performance
HIMCX vs. FMDGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIMCX achieves a 10.47% return, which is significantly higher than FMDGX's 5.96% return.
HIMCX
- 1D
- 2.40%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 10.47%
- 6M
- 9.20%
- 1Y
- 6.69%
- 3Y*
- 7.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.54%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
FMDGX
- 1D
- 2.17%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- 5.96%
- 6M
- 4.76%
- 1Y
- 4.87%
- 3Y*
- 15.07%
- 5Y*
- 5.72%
- 10Y*
- —
HIMCX vs. FMDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIMCX Hartford MidCap HLS Fund | 10.47% | -0.53% | 6.32% | 14.94% | -24.81% | 10.22% | 25.14% | 3.73% |
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund | 5.96% | 8.60% | 22.03% | 25.79% | -26.67% | 12.67% | 34.84% | 4.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIMCX and FMDGX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.92 |
The correlation between HIMCX and FMDGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIMCX vs. FMDGX — Risk / Return Rank
HIMCX
FMDGX
HIMCX vs. FMDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford MidCap HLS Fund (HIMCX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HIMCX | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.07 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | 0.38 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.33 | 1.09 | +0.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HIMCX vs. FMDGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIMCX drawdown since its inception was -50.83%, which is greater than FMDGX's maximum drawdown of -38.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMCX and FMDGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIMCX | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.83% | -38.59% | -12.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.89% | -14.75% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.70% | -25.30% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.51% | -38.59% | +5.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.84% | -0.06% | -1.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.95% | -11.11% | +1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.33% | 5.10% | +0.23% |
Volatility
HIMCX vs. FMDGX - Volatility Comparison
Hartford MidCap HLS Fund (HIMCX) has a higher volatility of 7.18% compared to Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) at 6.09%. This indicates that HIMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIMCX | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.18% | 6.09% | +1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.94% | 13.53% | +2.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.50% | 17.13% | +2.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.83% | 22.48% | -0.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.53% | 24.29% | -2.76% |
HIMCX vs. FMDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIMCX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FMDGX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIMCX vs. FMDGX - Dividend Comparison
HIMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.67%, more than FMDGX's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund | 1.75% | 1.85% | 0.47% | 0.63% | 0.81% | 6.43% | 0.36% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HIMCX Hartford MidCap HLS Fund | 20.67% | 22.84% | 2.39% | 7.25% | 19.76% | 18.32% | 8.42% | 16.22% | 11.78% | 4.61% | 10.87% | 13.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, HIMCX and FMDGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
HIMCX has higher volatility (7.18%) compared to FMDGX (6.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIMCX dropped -50.83% vs FMDGX's -38.59%.
HIMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HIMCX and FMDGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer