PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIMCX vs. SEMNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIMCX vs. SEMNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford MidCap HLS Fund (HIMCX) and Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (SEMNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIMCX achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly lower than SEMNX's 33.16% return. Over the past 10 years, HIMCX has underperformed SEMNX with an annualized return of 8.42%, while SEMNX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.97% annualized return.


HIMCX

1D
0.47%
1M
1.60%
YTD
9.53%
6M
7.10%
1Y
9.21%
3Y*
8.09%
5Y*
0.55%
10Y*
8.42%

SEMNX

1D
-1.48%
1M
4.77%
YTD
33.16%
6M
35.92%
1Y
68.72%
3Y*
27.65%
5Y*
8.41%
10Y*
11.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIMCX vs. SEMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HIMCX
Hartford MidCap HLS Fund
9.53%-0.53%6.32%14.94%-24.81%10.22%25.14%32.64%-7.51%24.48%
SEMNX
Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I
33.16%40.36%7.56%8.80%-22.30%-5.11%23.58%22.12%-15.57%40.87%

Correlation

The correlation between HIMCX and SEMNX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2007

0.67

The correlation between HIMCX and SEMNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIMCX vs. SEMNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIMCX
HIMCX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
HIMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
HIMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

SEMNX
SEMNX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SEMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
SEMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIMCX vs. SEMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford MidCap HLS Fund (HIMCX) and Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (SEMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIMCXSEMNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.63

-0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

4.75

-4.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.61

19.18

-17.57

HIMCX vs. SEMNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIMCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the SEMNX Sharpe Ratio of 3.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIMCX and SEMNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIMCXSEMNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

3.48

-3.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.46

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.64

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.31

-0.19

Drawdowns

HIMCX vs. SEMNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIMCX drawdown since its inception was -50.83%, smaller than the maximum SEMNX drawdown of -65.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMCX and SEMNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIMCXSEMNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.83%

-65.10%

+14.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.89%

-14.80%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.70%

-16.67%

-10.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.51%

-39.49%

+5.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.03%

-42.47%

+4.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.68%

-2.11%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.96%

-17.25%

+7.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.30%

3.66%

+1.64%

Volatility

HIMCX vs. SEMNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford MidCap HLS Fund (HIMCX) is 5.26%, while Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (SEMNX) has a volatility of 9.20%. This indicates that HIMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEMNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIMCXSEMNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

9.20%

-3.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.78%

17.39%

-2.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.55%

20.21%

-1.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.66%

18.21%

+3.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.53%

18.68%

+2.85%

HIMCX vs. SEMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIMCX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than SEMNX's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIMCX vs. SEMNX - Dividend Comparison

HIMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.85%, more than SEMNX's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HIMCX
Hartford MidCap HLS Fund
20.85%22.84%2.39%7.25%19.76%18.32%8.42%16.22%11.78%4.61%10.87%13.33%
SEMNX
Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I
1.19%1.58%1.16%1.33%1.86%1.21%0.77%2.17%1.22%0.82%0.94%0.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIMCX and SEMNX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEMNX has higher volatility (9.20%) compared to HIMCX (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIMCX dropped -50.83% vs SEMNX's -65.10%.

SEMNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.48 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIMCX and SEMNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer