PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIMCX vs. HDGYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIMCX vs. HDGYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford MidCap HLS Fund (HIMCX) and The Hartford Dividend and Growth Fund (HDGYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIMCX achieves a 10.47% return, which is significantly higher than HDGYX's 9.16% return. Over the past 10 years, HIMCX has underperformed HDGYX with an annualized return of 8.70%, while HDGYX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.21% annualized return.


HIMCX

1D
2.40%
1M
2.07%
YTD
10.47%
6M
9.20%
1Y
6.69%
3Y*
7.27%
5Y*
0.54%
10Y*
8.70%

HDGYX

1D
0.33%
1M
-0.05%
YTD
9.16%
6M
8.29%
1Y
20.76%
3Y*
15.53%
5Y*
10.93%
10Y*
13.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIMCX vs. HDGYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HIMCX
Hartford MidCap HLS Fund
10.47%-0.53%6.32%14.94%-24.81%10.22%25.14%32.64%-7.51%24.48%
HDGYX
The Hartford Dividend and Growth Fund
9.16%17.15%12.41%14.11%-8.62%31.32%8.03%31.88%-5.44%18.29%

Correlation

The correlation between HIMCX and HDGYX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 1997

0.84

The correlation between HIMCX and HDGYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIMCX vs. HDGYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIMCX
HIMCX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
HIMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
HIMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

HDGYX
HDGYX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
HDGYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDGYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDGYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
HDGYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDGYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIMCX vs. HDGYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford MidCap HLS Fund (HIMCX) and The Hartford Dividend and Growth Fund (HDGYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HIMCXHDGYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.35

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.45

2.68

-2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.33

11.49

-10.16

HIMCX vs. HDGYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIMCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the HDGYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIMCX and HDGYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HIMCX vs. HDGYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIMCX drawdown since its inception was -50.83%, roughly equal to the maximum HDGYX drawdown of -50.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMCX and HDGYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIMCXHDGYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.83%

-50.78%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.89%

-8.00%

-7.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.70%

-13.70%

-13.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.51%

-18.79%

-14.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.03%

-34.98%

-3.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

-0.28%

-1.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.95%

-5.80%

-4.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.33%

1.86%

+3.47%

Volatility

HIMCX vs. HDGYX - Volatility Comparison

Hartford MidCap HLS Fund (HIMCX) has a higher volatility of 7.18% compared to The Hartford Dividend and Growth Fund (HDGYX) at 3.44%. This indicates that HIMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDGYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIMCXHDGYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.18%

3.44%

+3.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.94%

8.33%

+7.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.50%

10.93%

+8.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.83%

14.03%

+7.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.53%

16.55%

+4.98%

HIMCX vs. HDGYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HIMCX and HDGYX have an expense ratio of 0.69%.


Dividends

HIMCX vs. HDGYX - Dividend Comparison

HIMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.67%, more than HDGYX's 11.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDGYX
The Hartford Dividend and Growth Fund
11.24%12.31%10.61%1.82%6.08%5.80%3.61%7.15%12.64%11.68%4.92%10.83%
HIMCX
Hartford MidCap HLS Fund
20.67%22.84%2.39%7.25%19.76%18.32%8.42%16.22%11.78%4.61%10.87%13.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIMCX and HDGYX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIMCX has higher volatility (7.18%) compared to HDGYX (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIMCX dropped -50.83% vs HDGYX's -50.78%.

HDGYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIMCX and HDGYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer