HIMCX vs. CTIGX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

HIMCX (Hartford MidCap HLS Fund) and CTIGX (Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, HIMCX returned -0.94%/yr vs 7.68%/yr for CTIGX. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. HIMCX charges 0.69%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for CTIGX.

Performance

HIMCX vs. CTIGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford MidCap HLS Fund (HIMCX) and Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIMCX achieves a 2.84% return, which is significantly lower than CTIGX's 13.72% return.

HIMCX

• 1D: 2.89%
• 1M: -5.20%
• 6M: 2.05%
• YTD: 2.84%
• 1Y: -0.41%
• 3Y*: 3.47%
• 5Y*: -0.94%
• 10Y*: 7.69%
• ALL TIME*: 18.90%

CTIGX

• 1D: 3.61%
• 1M: -9.09%
• 6M: 13.72%
• YTD: 13.72%
• 1Y: 33.66%
• 3Y*: 25.27%
• 5Y*: 7.68%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CTIGX Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
HIMCX Hartford MidCap HLS Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

HIMCX vs. CTIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HIMCX Hartford MidCap HLS Fund	2.84%	-0.53%	6.32%	14.94%	-24.81%	10.22%	25.14%	2.52%
CTIGX Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund	13.72%	21.21%	44.09%	12.26%	-34.88%	7.64%	58.94%	-3.80%

Correlation

The correlation between HIMCX and CTIGX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2019	0.87

The correlation between HIMCX and CTIGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HIMCX vs. CTIGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HIMCX

HIMCX Risk / Return Rank: 3
HIMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
HIMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
HIMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
HIMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
HIMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

CTIGX

CTIGX Risk / Return Rank: 43
CTIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
CTIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
CTIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
CTIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
CTIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HIMCX vs. CTIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford MidCap HLS Fund (HIMCX) and Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HIMCX	CTIGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.15	1.10	-1.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.07	1.61	-1.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.20	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.19	1.90	-2.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.53	7.98	-8.51

HIMCX vs. CTIGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIMCX Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the CTIGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIMCX and CTIGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HIMCX vs. CTIGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIMCX drawdown since its inception was -50.83%, which is greater than CTIGX's maximum drawdown of -46.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMCX and CTIGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HIMCX	CTIGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.83%	-46.26%	-4.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.89%	-16.83%	+0.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.70%	-29.30%	+2.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.51%	-46.26%	+12.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.62%	-13.83%	+5.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.94%	-18.30%	+8.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.63%	4.00%	+1.63%

Volatility

HIMCX vs. CTIGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford MidCap HLS Fund (HIMCX) is 6.44%, while Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX) has a volatility of 9.62%. This indicates that HIMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HIMCX	CTIGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.44%	9.62%	-3.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.75%	23.84%	-7.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.35%	29.20%	-8.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.94%	27.53%	-5.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.60%	29.28%	-7.68%

HIMCX vs. CTIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIMCX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than CTIGX's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

HIMCX vs. CTIGX - Dividend Comparison

HIMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.20%, more than CTIGX's 4.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CTIGX Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund	4.03%	4.59%	2.80%	0.00%	0.00%	11.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HIMCX Hartford MidCap HLS Fund	22.20%	22.84%	2.39%	7.25%	19.76%	18.32%	8.42%	16.22%	11.78%	4.61%	10.87%	13.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HIMCX and CTIGX in my portfolio?

HIMCX and CTIGX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HIMCX or CTIGX?

CTIGX has higher volatility (9.62%) compared to HIMCX (6.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIMCX dropped -50.83% vs CTIGX's -46.26%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CTIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.