PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIGH vs. HYSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIGH vs. HYSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH) and Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIGH achieves a -0.38% return, which is significantly lower than HYSA's 1.08% return.


HIGH

1D
-0.32%
1M
1.63%
YTD
-0.38%
6M
-1.48%
1Y
-3.46%
3Y*
3.02%
5Y*
10Y*

HYSA

1D
-0.45%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.08%
6M
1.44%
1Y
6.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIGH vs. HYSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HIGH
Simplify Enhanced Income ETF
-0.38%4.35%1.52%0.97%
HYSA
Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF
1.08%8.37%6.71%5.98%

Correlation

The correlation between HIGH and HYSA is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2023

0.26

HIGH vs. HYSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HIGH
HYSA

Financial Services

71.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

HIGH
71.3%
HYSA

-

Basic Materials

HIGH

-

HYSA

-

Communication Services

HIGH

-

HYSA
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

HIGH

-

HYSA

-

Consumer Defensive

HIGH

-

HYSA

-

Energy

HIGH

-

HYSA

-

Healthcare

HIGH

-

HYSA

-

Industrials

HIGH

-

HYSA

-

Real Estate

HIGH

-

HYSA

-

Technology

HIGH

-

HYSA

-

Utilities

HIGH

-

HYSA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIGH vs. HYSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIGH
HIGH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
HIGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIGH Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
HIGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIGH Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

HYSA
HYSA Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
HYSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYSA Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
HYSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYSA Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIGH vs. HYSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH) and Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIGHHYSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.24

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

2.00

-2.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.53

8.04

-8.57

HIGH vs. HYSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIGH Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is lower than the HYSA Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIGH and HYSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIGHHYSADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.39

1.35

-1.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

1.36

-0.97

Drawdowns

HIGH vs. HYSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIGH drawdown since its inception was -9.50%, which is greater than HYSA's maximum drawdown of -4.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIGH and HYSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIGHHYSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.50%

-4.90%

-4.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.50%

-3.15%

-6.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.11%

-0.45%

-6.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.37%

-0.68%

-1.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.53%

0.78%

+5.75%

Volatility

HIGH vs. HYSA - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH) and Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA) have volatilities of 1.23% and 1.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIGHHYSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

1.27%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.50%

3.57%

-0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.83%

4.70%

+4.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.56%

6.08%

+3.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.56%

6.08%

+3.48%

HIGH vs. HYSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIGH has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than HYSA's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIGH vs. HYSA - Dividend Comparison

HIGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.33%, more than HYSA's 6.77% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
HIGH
Simplify Enhanced Income ETF
7.33%7.71%8.34%9.40%0.62%
HYSA
Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF
6.77%6.70%6.99%2.65%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIGH and HYSA have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYSA has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to HIGH (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIGH dropped -9.50% vs HYSA's -4.90%.

On 1-year performance, HYSA leads with 6.26% vs -3.46% for HIGH. On fees, HIGH is cheaper at 0.51% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HYSA has performed better with a 6.26% return vs -3.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HIGH is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for HYSA.

HIGH has the higher dividend yield at 7.33%, compared with 6.77% for HYSA.

HIGH is categorized as Derivative Income, while HYSA is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and BondBloxx. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for HIGH and 0.55% for HYSA.

HYSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIGH and HYSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer