PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYSA vs. XCCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HYSA vs. XCCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA) and BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HYSA vs. XCCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HYSA
Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF
-0.98%8.37%6.71%5.98%
XCCC
BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
-2.95%7.25%13.01%5.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYSA achieves a -0.98% return, which is significantly higher than XCCC's -2.95% return.


HYSA

1D
0.95%
1M
-2.16%
YTD
-0.98%
6M
-0.13%
1Y
5.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XCCC

1D
1.20%
1M
-1.66%
YTD
-2.95%
6M
-2.98%
1Y
6.05%
3Y*
10.34%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HYSA vs. XCCC - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYSA has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XCCC's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HYSA vs. XCCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYSA
HYSA Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
HYSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYSA Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
HYSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYSA Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

XCCC
XCCC Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
XCCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCCC Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
XCCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCCC Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYSA vs. XCCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA) and BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYSAXCCCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.95

0.63

+0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.44

0.90

+0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.16

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

0.70

+0.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.34

3.09

+3.25

HYSA vs. XCCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYSA Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is higher than the XCCC Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYSA and XCCC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYSAXCCCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

0.63

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.30

0.90

+0.40

Correlation

The correlation between HYSA and XCCC is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

HYSA vs. XCCC - Dividend Comparison

HYSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.81%, less than XCCC's 10.23% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
HYSA
Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF
6.81%6.70%6.99%2.65%0.00%
XCCC
BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
10.23%10.06%10.68%12.05%7.63%

Drawdowns

HYSA vs. XCCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYSA drawdown since its inception was -4.90%, smaller than the maximum XCCC drawdown of -10.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYSA and XCCC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HYSAXCCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-10.99%

+6.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.03%

-8.25%

+4.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

-3.93%

+1.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.69%

-1.95%

+1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

1.87%

-0.93%

Volatility

HYSA vs. XCCC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA) is 2.10%, while BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that HYSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HYSAXCCCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.10%

2.84%

-0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.53%

4.10%

-0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.00%

9.63%

-3.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.17%

8.95%

-2.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.17%

8.95%

-2.78%