PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYSA vs. FHQFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYSA vs. FHQFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA) and Fidelity Series Treasury Bill Index Fund (FHQFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYSA achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly higher than FHQFX's 1.41% return.


HYSA

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.73%
YTD
1.54%
6M
1.67%
1Y
5.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FHQFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.41%
6M
1.74%
1Y
4.08%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
3.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYSA vs. FHQFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HYSA
Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF
1.54%8.37%6.71%5.95%
FHQFX
Fidelity Series Treasury Bill Index Fund
1.41%4.37%5.56%1.17%

Correlation

The correlation between HYSA and FHQFX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYSA vs. FHQFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYSA
HYSA Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
HYSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYSA Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
HYSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYSA Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FHQFX
FHQFX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
FHQFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHQFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHQFX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
FHQFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHQFX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYSA vs. FHQFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA) and Fidelity Series Treasury Bill Index Fund (FHQFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYSAFHQFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-26.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

20.94

-19.72

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

41.79

-39.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.35

119.47

-112.11

HYSA vs. FHQFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the FHQFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYSA and FHQFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYSA vs. FHQFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYSA drawdown since its inception was -4.90%, which is greater than FHQFX's maximum drawdown of -0.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYSA and FHQFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYSAFHQFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-0.70%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.15%

-0.10%

-3.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

0.00%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.67%

-0.08%

-0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

0.03%

+0.75%

Volatility

HYSA vs. FHQFX - Volatility Comparison

Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA) has a higher volatility of 1.12% compared to Fidelity Series Treasury Bill Index Fund (FHQFX) at 0.31%. This indicates that HYSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHQFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYSAFHQFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.12%

0.31%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.56%

0.74%

+2.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.70%

1.14%

+3.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.03%

1.26%

+4.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.03%

1.18%

+4.85%

HYSA vs. FHQFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYSA has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FHQFX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYSA vs. FHQFX - Dividend Comparison

HYSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.74%, more than FHQFX's 3.89% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
FHQFX
Fidelity Series Treasury Bill Index Fund
3.89%4.16%5.09%4.67%0.00%0.01%0.06%
HYSA
Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF
6.74%6.70%6.99%2.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYSA and FHQFX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYSA has higher volatility (1.12%) compared to FHQFX (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYSA dropped -4.90% vs FHQFX's -0.70%.

FHQFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.68 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYSA and FHQFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer