PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIGH vs. BIZD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIGH vs. BIZD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIGH achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly higher than BIZD's -6.86% return.


HIGH

1D
0.16%
1M
0.39%
YTD
-0.45%
6M
-0.49%
1Y
-2.23%
3Y*
2.92%
5Y*
10Y*

BIZD

1D
0.71%
1M
0.79%
YTD
-6.86%
6M
-8.47%
1Y
-11.02%
3Y*
5.47%
5Y*
4.25%
10Y*
8.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIGH vs. BIZD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HIGH
Simplify Enhanced Income ETF
-0.45%4.35%1.52%7.70%0.47%
BIZD
VanEck BDC Income ETF
-6.86%-4.96%15.63%27.02%-0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between HIGH and BIZD is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2022

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIGH vs. BIZD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIGH
HIGH Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
HIGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIGH Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
HIGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIGH Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

BIZD
BIZD Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BIZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIZD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BIZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIZD Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIGH vs. BIZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HIGHBIZDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

0.91

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.31

-0.53

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.44

-0.91

+0.47

HIGH vs. BIZD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIGH Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is higher than the BIZD Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIGH and BIZD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HIGH vs. BIZD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIGH drawdown since its inception was -9.50%, smaller than the maximum BIZD drawdown of -55.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIGH and BIZD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIGHBIZDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.50%

-55.44%

+45.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.50%

-22.22%

+12.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.50%

-22.56%

+13.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.18%

-17.39%

+10.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.41%

-6.74%

+4.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.64%

12.97%

-6.33%

Volatility

HIGH vs. BIZD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH) is 1.61%, while VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) has a volatility of 4.92%. This indicates that HIGH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIGHBIZDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.61%

4.92%

-3.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.67%

14.97%

-11.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.74%

18.32%

-9.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.54%

17.44%

-7.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.54%

21.75%

-12.21%

HIGH vs. BIZD - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIGH has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than BIZD's 12.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIGH vs. BIZD - Dividend Comparison

HIGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.34%, less than BIZD's 13.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIZD
VanEck BDC Income ETF
13.56%11.78%10.94%10.96%11.21%8.14%10.39%9.13%10.88%9.13%8.51%9.12%
HIGH
Simplify Enhanced Income ETF
7.34%7.71%8.34%9.40%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIGH and BIZD have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIZD has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to HIGH (1.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIGH dropped -9.50% vs BIZD's -55.44%.

On 3-year performance, BIZD leads with 5.47% vs 2.92% for HIGH. On fees, HIGH is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, HIGH has been the lower-risk option at 1.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BIZD has performed better with a 5.47% return vs 2.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HIGH is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 12.86% for BIZD.

BIZD has the higher dividend yield at 13.56%, compared with 7.34% for HIGH.

HIGH is categorized as Derivative Income, while BIZD is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for HIGH and 12.86% for BIZD.

HIGH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.34 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIGH and BIZD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer