PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIBS vs. METD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HIBS vs. METD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares (HIBS) and Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HIBS vs. METD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
HIBS
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares
-8.44%-72.44%-21.68%
METD
Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF
10.80%-17.33%-15.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIBS achieves a -8.44% return, which is significantly lower than METD's 10.80% return.


HIBS

1D
-2.91%
1M
9.61%
YTD
-8.44%
6M
-25.12%
1Y
-80.81%
3Y*
-52.78%
5Y*
-48.81%
10Y*

METD

1D
-1.30%
1M
11.22%
YTD
10.80%
6M
19.37%
1Y
-7.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HIBS vs. METD - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIBS has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than METD's 1.00% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HIBS vs. METD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIBS
HIBS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
HIBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIBS Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
HIBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIBS Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

METD
METD Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
METD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
METD Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
METD Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
METD Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIBS vs. METD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares (HIBS) and Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIBSMETDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.90

-0.19

-0.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.77

0.01

-1.78

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

1.00

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.91

-0.23

-0.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.04

-0.31

-0.73

HIBS vs. METD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIBS Sharpe Ratio is -0.90, which is lower than the METD Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIBS and METD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIBSMETDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.90

-0.19

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.69

-0.37

-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between HIBS and METD is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

HIBS vs. METD - Dividend Comparison

HIBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, more than METD's 2.46% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
HIBS
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares
5.17%8.42%5.34%6.49%0.04%0.00%0.92%0.13%
METD
Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF
2.46%3.35%2.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HIBS vs. METD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIBS drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than METD's maximum drawdown of -46.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIBS and METD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HIBSMETDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.96%

-46.03%

-53.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-88.93%

-39.89%

-49.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.96%

-28.79%

-71.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-92.95%

-28.04%

-64.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

78.08%

29.16%

+48.92%

Volatility

HIBS vs. METD - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares (HIBS) has a higher volatility of 27.85% compared to Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) at 13.60%. This indicates that HIBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than METD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HIBSMETDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.85%

13.60%

+14.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.19%

26.77%

+27.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

90.43%

40.32%

+50.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.11%

36.25%

+45.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.36%

36.25%

+59.11%