PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIBS vs. HIBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIBS vs. HIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares (HIBS) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIBS achieves a -61.28% return, which is significantly lower than HIBL's 83.10% return.


HIBS

1D
11.66%
1M
-22.55%
YTD
-61.28%
6M
-58.56%
1Y
-81.56%
3Y*
-62.72%
5Y*
-54.42%
10Y*

HIBL

1D
-12.27%
1M
13.78%
YTD
83.10%
6M
71.60%
1Y
227.44%
3Y*
55.36%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIBS vs. HIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HIBS
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares
-61.28%-72.44%-26.60%-62.94%-7.59%-75.27%-91.59%-17.80%
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
83.10%60.38%-0.40%81.02%-68.24%129.14%-24.96%19.23%

Correlation

The correlation between HIBS and HIBL is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2019

-0.99

The correlation between HIBS and HIBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIBS vs. HIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIBS
HIBS Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
HIBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIBS Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
HIBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIBS Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

HIBL
HIBL Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
HIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
HIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIBS vs. HIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares (HIBS) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HIBSHIBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.73

1.39

-0.67

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

7.29

-8.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.62

25.38

-26.99

HIBS vs. HIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIBS Sharpe Ratio is -1.10, which is lower than the HIBL Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIBS and HIBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HIBS vs. HIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIBS drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than HIBL's maximum drawdown of -88.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIBS and HIBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIBSHIBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.98%

-88.27%

-11.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-82.33%

-31.39%

-50.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-96.91%

-69.66%

-27.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.70%

-81.58%

-17.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.98%

-12.27%

-87.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-93.13%

-43.91%

-49.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

53.14%

9.01%

+44.13%

Volatility

HIBS vs. HIBL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares (HIBS) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) have volatilities of 35.05% and 36.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIBSHIBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

35.05%

36.89%

-1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

60.54%

59.56%

+0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.07%

73.15%

+0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

83.51%

83.29%

+0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.27%

92.43%

+2.84%

HIBS vs. HIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIBS has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is lower than HIBL's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIBS vs. HIBL - Dividend Comparison

HIBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.23%, more than HIBL's 1.26% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
1.26%2.43%0.82%0.69%0.00%0.06%0.19%0.19%
HIBS
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares
12.23%8.42%5.34%6.49%0.04%0.00%0.92%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIBS and HIBL have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIBL has higher volatility (36.89%) compared to HIBS (35.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIBS dropped -99.98% vs HIBL's -88.27%.

On 5-year performance, HIBL leads with 11.88% vs -54.42% for HIBS. On fees, HIBS is cheaper at 1.06% per year. On volatility, HIBS has been the lower-risk option at 35.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HIBL has performed better with a 11.88% return vs -54.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HIBS is cheaper with a 1.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for HIBL.

HIBS has the higher dividend yield at 12.23%, compared with 1.26% for HIBL.

HIBS is categorized as Inverse Equities, while HIBL is Leveraged Equities. HIBS tracks S&P 500® High Beta Index, while HIBL tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.06% for HIBS and 1.12% for HIBL.

HIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIBS and HIBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer