HIBL vs. TERG
HIBL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares) and TERG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. HIBL is passively managed, while TERG is actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HIBL charges 1.12%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TERG.
Performance
HIBL vs. TERG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIBL achieves a 95.37% return, which is significantly lower than TERG's 225.36% return.
HIBL
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 31.17%
- YTD
- 95.37%
- 6M
- 95.99%
- 1Y
- 276.75%
- 3Y*
- 62.38%
- 5Y*
- 11.47%
- 10Y*
- —
TERG
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 23.46%
- YTD
- 225.36%
- 6M
- 202.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HIBL vs. TERG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares | 95.37% | 23.72% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 225.36% | 28.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIBL and TERG is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIBL vs. TERG — Risk / Return Rank
HIBL
TERG
HIBL vs. TERG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HIBL | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.88 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 32.55 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HIBL | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 9.47 | -9.23 |
Drawdowns
HIBL vs. TERG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIBL drawdown since its inception was -88.27%, which is greater than TERG's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIBL and TERG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIBL | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.27% | -49.52% | -38.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.70% | -17.07% | +14.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.17% | -13.75% | -30.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.55% | — | — |
Volatility
HIBL vs. TERG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIBL | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.02% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.42% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.96% | 138.78% | -72.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.15% | 138.78% | -56.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 91.87% | 138.78% | -46.91% |
HIBL vs. TERG - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIBL has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than TERG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIBL vs. TERG - Dividend Comparison
HIBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, while TERG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares | 1.18% | 2.43% | 0.82% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIBL and TERG have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TERG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TERG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for HIBL.
HIBL has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.00% for TERG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.12% for HIBL and 0.75% for TERG.
Find the right allocation for HIBL and TERG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer