PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIBL vs. QTAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HIBL vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HIBL vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
-6.14%60.38%-0.40%81.02%-68.24%25.28%
QTAP
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April
3.02%19.36%17.34%43.32%-25.87%15.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIBL achieves a -6.14% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 3.02% return.


HIBL

1D
3.15%
1M
-15.20%
YTD
-6.14%
6M
2.41%
1Y
133.35%
3Y*
27.73%
5Y*
1.55%
10Y*

QTAP

1D
1.74%
1M
1.79%
YTD
3.02%
6M
5.43%
1Y
21.08%
3Y*
19.58%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HIBL vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIBL has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HIBL vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIBL
HIBL Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
HIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
HIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

QTAP
QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIBL vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIBLQTAPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.49

1.29

+0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.13

2.05

+0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.50

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

1.81

+1.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.78

12.95

-1.17

HIBL vs. QTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIBL Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the QTAP Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIBL and QTAP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIBLQTAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

1.29

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.64

-0.54

Correlation

The correlation between HIBL and QTAP is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

HIBL vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

HIBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, while QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
2.46%2.43%0.82%0.69%0.00%0.06%0.19%0.19%
QTAP
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HIBL vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIBL drawdown since its inception was -88.27%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIBL and QTAP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HIBLQTAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.27%

-29.44%

-58.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.08%

-12.04%

-32.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.76%

0.00%

-26.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.22%

-5.21%

-40.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.69%

1.68%

+10.01%

Volatility

HIBL vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) has a higher volatility of 25.93% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 1.88%. This indicates that HIBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HIBLQTAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.93%

1.88%

+24.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.24%

3.23%

+50.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

90.33%

16.38%

+73.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

81.88%

19.03%

+62.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

92.41%

19.03%

+73.38%