HIBL vs. LINT

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

HIBL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. HIBL is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HIBL charges 1.12%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

HIBL vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIBL achieves a 62.78% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 395.01% return.

HIBL

• 1D: -7.56%
• 1M: -9.73%
• 6M: 41.34%
• YTD: 62.78%
• 1Y: 128.52%
• 3Y*: 39.19%
• 5Y*: 12.26%
• 10Y*: —

LINT

• 1D: -12.33%
• 1M: -36.20%
• 6M: 257.06%
• YTD: 395.01%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIBL vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares	62.78%	26.03%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	395.01%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between HIBL and LINT is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.57

HIBL vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HIBL	LINT
Technology	9.3%	100.0%
Financial Services	2.8%	-
Industrials	2.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	2.4%	-
Healthcare	1.2%	-
Utilities	0.6%	-
Basic Materials	0.6%	-
Communication Services	0.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.2%	-
Energy	0.2%	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

HIBL vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIBL

HIBL Risk / Return Rank: 70
HIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
HIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
HIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 56
HIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
HIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 84

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIBL vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HIBL	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.12	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.41	—	—

Drawdowns

HIBL vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIBL drawdown since its inception was -88.27%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIBL and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	HIBL	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.27%	-49.54%	-38.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-69.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-81.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.01%	-48.95%	+26.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.67%	-20.99%	-22.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.62%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HIBL	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	34.48%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	62.65%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	76.01%	168.59%	-92.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	83.63%	168.59%	-84.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	92.50%	168.59%	-76.09%

HIBL vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIBL has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

HIBL vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

HIBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, more than LINT's 0.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares	1.39%	2.43%	0.82%	0.69%	0.00%	0.06%	0.19%	0.19%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.55%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HIBL and LINT in my portfolio?

HIBL and LINT have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HIBL or LINT?

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HIBL or LINT?

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for HIBL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HIBL or LINT?

HIBL has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.55% for LINT.

What is the main difference between HIBL and LINT?

Their fees differ too: 1.12% for HIBL and 0.97% for LINT.