HIBIX vs. NAINX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HIBIX (Virtus Newfleet Low Duration Core Plus Bond Fund) and NAINX (Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund) are both mutual funds - HIBIX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Virtus, while NAINX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Virtus. Over the past 10 years, HIBIX returned 2.75%/yr vs 8.17%/yr for NAINX. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HIBIX charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for NAINX.

Performance

HIBIX vs. NAINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Newfleet Low Duration Core Plus Bond Fund (HIBIX) and Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund (NAINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIBIX achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly lower than NAINX's 1.80% return. Over the past 10 years, HIBIX has underperformed NAINX with an annualized return of 2.75%, while NAINX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.17% annualized return.

HIBIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 1.20%
• 6M: 1.51%
• 1Y: 4.94%
• 3Y*: 5.67%
• 5Y*: 2.81%
• 10Y*: 2.75%

NAINX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 3.91%
• YTD: 1.80%
• 6M: 1.38%
• 1Y: 3.28%
• 3Y*: 10.96%
• 5Y*: 2.97%
• 10Y*: 8.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIBIX vs. NAINX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HIBIX Virtus Newfleet Low Duration Core Plus Bond Fund	1.20%	6.12%	5.61%	6.57%	-4.85%	-0.11%	4.05%	5.45%	0.76%	2.63%
NAINX Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund	1.80%	6.83%	14.00%	22.38%	-28.48%	6.63%	31.47%	28.49%	-7.19%	19.84%

Correlation

The correlation between HIBIX and NAINX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 1996	0.05

Over the past year, HIBIX and NAINX have become more correlated (0.41) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

HIBIX vs. NAINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIBIX

HIBIX Risk / Return Rank: 90
HIBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
HIBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
HIBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
HIBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
HIBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

NAINX

NAINX Risk / Return Rank: 5
NAINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
NAINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
NAINX Omega Ratio Rank: 5
NAINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
NAINX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIBIX vs. NAINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Newfleet Low Duration Core Plus Bond Fund (HIBIX) and Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund (NAINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HIBIX	NAINX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.69	0.39	+2.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.49	0.61	+4.88
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.74	1.07	+0.67
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.46	0.33	+4.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	18.79	1.10	+17.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HIBIX vs. NAINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIBIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the NAINX Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIBIX and NAINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HIBIX	NAINX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.69	0.39	+2.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.28	0.22	+1.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.30	0.62	+0.68
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.41	0.60	+0.81

Drawdowns

HIBIX vs. NAINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIBIX drawdown since its inception was -8.57%, smaller than the maximum NAINX drawdown of -36.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIBIX and NAINX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HIBIX	NAINX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.57%	-36.50%	+27.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.11%	-10.19%	+9.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.12%	-11.79%	+10.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.11%	-36.50%	+29.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-8.57%	-36.50%	+27.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.09%	-0.49%	+0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.80%	-5.27%	+4.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.26%	3.08%	-2.82%

Volatility

HIBIX vs. NAINX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Newfleet Low Duration Core Plus Bond Fund (HIBIX) is 0.63%, while Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund (NAINX) has a volatility of 2.67%. This indicates that HIBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NAINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HIBIX	NAINX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.63%	2.67%	-2.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.37%	7.00%	-5.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.84%	8.79%	-6.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.20%	13.69%	-11.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.12%	13.30%	-11.18%

HIBIX vs. NAINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIBIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than NAINX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

HIBIX vs. NAINX - Dividend Comparison

HIBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, less than NAINX's 15.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HIBIX Virtus Newfleet Low Duration Core Plus Bond Fund	4.55%	4.60%	3.72%	3.28%	2.11%	1.27%	2.28%	2.86%	2.74%	2.23%	2.10%	2.28%
NAINX Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund	15.81%	15.87%	13.38%	1.94%	7.34%	7.54%	2.06%	2.24%	4.41%	2.61%	10.78%	7.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HIBIX and NAINX in my portfolio?

HIBIX and NAINX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HIBIX or NAINX?

NAINX has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to HIBIX (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIBIX dropped -8.57% vs NAINX's -36.50%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HIBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.