PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIBIX vs. DFEQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIBIX vs. DFEQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Newfleet Low Duration Core Plus Bond Fund (HIBIX) and DFA Short-Term Extended Quality Portfolio (DFEQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIBIX achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly lower than DFEQX's 1.40% return. Over the past 10 years, HIBIX has outperformed DFEQX with an annualized return of 2.75%, while DFEQX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.94% annualized return.


HIBIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.20%
6M
1.51%
1Y
4.94%
3Y*
5.67%
5Y*
2.81%
10Y*
2.75%

DFEQX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.52%
YTD
1.40%
6M
1.63%
1Y
3.80%
3Y*
4.87%
5Y*
2.06%
10Y*
1.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIBIX vs. DFEQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HIBIX
Virtus Newfleet Low Duration Core Plus Bond Fund
1.20%6.12%5.61%6.57%-4.85%-0.11%4.05%5.45%0.76%2.63%
DFEQX
DFA Short-Term Extended Quality Portfolio
1.40%4.27%5.50%5.44%-5.18%-0.60%2.24%4.51%1.34%1.51%

Correlation

The correlation between HIBIX and DFEQX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.57

The correlation between HIBIX and DFEQX shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (3 years) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIBIX vs. DFEQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIBIX
HIBIX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
HIBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
HIBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

DFEQX
DFEQX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
DFEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
DFEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIBIX vs. DFEQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Newfleet Low Duration Core Plus Bond Fund (HIBIX) and DFA Short-Term Extended Quality Portfolio (DFEQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIBIXDFEQXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.69

3.61

-0.92

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.49

5.76

-0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.74

2.15

-0.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.46

5.07

-0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.79

21.22

-2.43

HIBIX vs. DFEQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIBIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is comparable to the DFEQX Sharpe Ratio of 3.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIBIX and DFEQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIBIXDFEQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

3.61

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.28

1.00

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.30

1.15

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.41

1.14

+0.27

Drawdowns

HIBIX vs. DFEQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIBIX drawdown since its inception was -8.57%, roughly equal to the maximum DFEQX drawdown of -8.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIBIX and DFEQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIBIXDFEQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.57%

-8.40%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.11%

-0.76%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.12%

-1.16%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.11%

-8.40%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.57%

-8.40%

-0.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

0.00%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.80%

-0.95%

+0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.26%

0.18%

+0.08%

Volatility

HIBIX vs. DFEQX - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Newfleet Low Duration Core Plus Bond Fund (HIBIX) has a higher volatility of 0.63% compared to DFA Short-Term Extended Quality Portfolio (DFEQX) at 0.45%. This indicates that HIBIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFEQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIBIXDFEQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.63%

0.45%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.37%

0.88%

+0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84%

1.07%

+0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.20%

2.08%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.12%

1.69%

+0.43%

HIBIX vs. DFEQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIBIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DFEQX's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIBIX vs. DFEQX - Dividend Comparison

HIBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, more than DFEQX's 4.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFEQX
DFA Short-Term Extended Quality Portfolio
4.13%3.62%4.40%3.34%1.78%1.05%0.47%2.18%3.14%1.51%1.59%1.72%
HIBIX
Virtus Newfleet Low Duration Core Plus Bond Fund
4.55%4.60%3.72%3.28%2.11%1.27%2.28%2.86%2.74%2.23%2.10%2.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIBIX and DFEQX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIBIX has higher volatility (0.63%) compared to DFEQX (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIBIX dropped -8.57% vs DFEQX's -8.40%.

DFEQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs 2.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIBIX and DFEQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer