PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HHL.TO vs. HBIX.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HHL.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF (HHL.TO) and Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HHL.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HHL.TO
Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF
-5.39%9.87%
HBIX.NEO
Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF
-24.07%-6.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HHL.TO achieves a -5.39% return, which is significantly higher than HBIX.NEO's -24.07% return.


HHL.TO

1D
0.71%
1M
-5.58%
YTD
-5.39%
6M
0.09%
1Y
0.94%
3Y*
5.34%
5Y*
7.11%
10Y*
7.56%

HBIX.NEO

1D
0.15%
1M
1.72%
YTD
-24.07%
6M
-46.58%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HHL.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HHL.TO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than HBIX.NEO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HHL.TO vs. HBIX.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HHL.TO
HHL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
HHL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HHL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
HHL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
HHL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
HHL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

HBIX.NEO
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HHL.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF (HHL.TO) and Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HHL.TOHBIX.NEODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.15

HHL.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HHL.TOHBIX.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

-0.60

+0.95

Correlation

The correlation between HHL.TO and HBIX.NEO is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

HHL.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Dividend Comparison

HHL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.14%, less than HBIX.NEO's 37.84% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HHL.TO
Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF
10.14%9.36%9.27%8.71%8.51%7.91%9.02%8.65%9.00%8.45%8.83%8.19%
HBIX.NEO
Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF
37.84%20.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HHL.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HHL.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.70%, smaller than the maximum HBIX.NEO drawdown of -55.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HHL.TO and HBIX.NEO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HHL.TOHBIX.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.70%

-55.90%

+29.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.49%

-49.72%

+41.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.17%

-19.91%

+13.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.17%

Volatility

HHL.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HHL.TOHBIX.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.95%

52.86%

-35.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.86%

52.86%

-39.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

52.86%

-37.14%