PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HHH vs. QSR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HHH vs. QSR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Howard Hughes Corporation (HHH) and Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HHH achieves a -16.18% return, which is significantly lower than QSR's 10.67% return. Over the past 10 years, HHH has underperformed QSR with an annualized return of -4.53%, while QSR has yielded a comparatively higher 9.02% annualized return.


HHH

1D
0.30%
1M
4.13%
YTD
-16.18%
6M
-20.94%
1Y
-5.47%
3Y*
-2.80%
5Y*
-7.73%
10Y*
-4.53%

QSR

1D
1.29%
1M
-2.08%
YTD
10.67%
6M
7.50%
1Y
13.67%
3Y*
3.14%
5Y*
5.51%
10Y*
9.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HHH vs. QSR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HHH
Howard Hughes Corporation
-16.18%3.71%-5.68%11.95%-24.92%28.95%-37.75%29.89%-25.63%15.05%
QSR
Restaurant Brands International Inc.
10.67%8.64%-13.80%24.64%10.72%2.72%-0.34%25.61%-12.15%30.69%

Correlation

The correlation between HHH and QSR is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2014

0.38

The correlation between HHH and QSR shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

HHH:

$2.80

QSR:

$2.09

PE Ratio

HHH:

23.86

QSR:

35.86

PS Ratio

HHH:

1.92

QSR:

3.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

HHH:

$1.51B

QSR:

$9.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HHH:

$168.32M

QSR:

$3.17B

EBITDA (TTM)

HHH:

$434.79M

QSR:

$2.49B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HHH vs. QSR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HHH
HHH Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
HHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
HHH Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
HHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
HHH Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

QSR
QSR Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
QSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSR Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSR Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HHH vs. QSR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Howard Hughes Corporation (HHH) and Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HHHQSRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.12

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.18

1.03

-1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.34

2.28

-2.62

HHH vs. QSR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HHH Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the QSR Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HHH and QSR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HHH vs. QSR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HHH drawdown since its inception was -76.60%, which is greater than QSR's maximum drawdown of -63.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HHH and QSR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HHHQSRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.60%

-63.03%

-13.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.39%

-13.29%

-18.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.39%

-24.53%

-6.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.95%

-29.27%

-19.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.68%

-63.03%

-10.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.16%

-8.35%

-47.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.77%

-12.04%

-19.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.25%

6.04%

+10.21%

Volatility

HHH vs. QSR - Volatility Comparison

Howard Hughes Corporation (HHH) has a higher volatility of 7.57% compared to Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) at 5.40%. This indicates that HHH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QSR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HHHQSRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.57%

5.40%

+2.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.63%

17.04%

+4.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.81%

23.04%

+6.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.44%

22.66%

+8.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.45%

27.52%

+8.93%

Dividends

HHH vs. QSR - Dividend Comparison

HHH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HHH
Howard Hughes Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QSR
Restaurant Brands International Inc.
3.35%3.63%3.56%2.82%3.34%3.49%3.40%3.14%3.44%1.27%1.30%1.18%

Financials

HHH vs. QSR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Howard Hughes Corporation and Restaurant Brands International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
235.92M
2.26B
(HHH) Total Revenue
(QSR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HHH vs. QSR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Howard Hughes Corporation and Restaurant Brands International Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
HHH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howard Hughes Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 235.92M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

QSR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

HHH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howard Hughes Corporation reported an operating income of 50.68M and revenue of 235.92M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.5%.

QSR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported an operating income of 606.00M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.8%.

HHH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howard Hughes Corporation reported a net income of 8.23M and revenue of 235.92M, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.

QSR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a net income of 338.00M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HHH and QSR have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HHH has higher volatility (7.57%) compared to QSR (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HHH dropped -76.60% vs QSR's -63.03%.

QSR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HHH and QSR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer