HHCZX vs. JAKVX
HHCZX (NexPoint Event Driven Fund) and JAKVX (John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past year, HHCZX returned 0.72% vs 27.46% for JAKVX. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HHCZX charges 1.69%/yr vs 1.54%/yr for JAKVX.
Performance
HHCZX vs. JAKVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HHCZX achieves a -4.23% return, which is significantly lower than JAKVX's 13.49% return.
HHCZX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- -4.23%
- 6M
- -7.00%
- 1Y
- 0.72%
- 3Y*
- 4.92%
- 5Y*
- -2.50%
- 10Y*
- 3.67%
JAKVX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.84%
- YTD
- 13.49%
- 6M
- 14.31%
- 1Y
- 27.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HHCZX vs. JAKVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HHCZX NexPoint Event Driven Fund | -4.23% | 6.84% |
JAKVX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 | 13.49% | 17.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between HHCZX and JAKVX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HHCZX vs. JAKVX — Risk / Return Rank
HHCZX
JAKVX
HHCZX vs. JAKVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NexPoint Event Driven Fund (HHCZX) and John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HHCZX | JAKVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.74 | -0.70 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.07 | 5.30 | -5.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.14 | 18.62 | -18.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HHCZX | JAKVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 | 3.67 | -3.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 4.10 | -3.82 |
Drawdowns
HHCZX vs. JAKVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HHCZX drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, which is greater than JAKVX's maximum drawdown of -5.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HHCZX and JAKVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HHCZX | JAKVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.57% | -5.16% | -28.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.42% | -5.16% | -10.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.96% | -0.22% | -15.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.01% | -0.80% | -13.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.88% | 1.47% | +6.41% |
Volatility
HHCZX vs. JAKVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NexPoint Event Driven Fund (HHCZX) is 2.30%, while John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX) has a volatility of 2.43%. This indicates that HHCZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JAKVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HHCZX | JAKVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.30% | 2.43% | -0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.03% | 5.88% | +2.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.29% | 7.49% | +8.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.68% | 7.32% | +3.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.27% | 7.32% | +8.95% |
HHCZX vs. JAKVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HHCZX has a 1.69% expense ratio, which is higher than JAKVX's 1.54% expense ratio.
Dividends
HHCZX vs. JAKVX - Dividend Comparison
HHCZX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JAKVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.47%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HHCZX NexPoint Event Driven Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.56% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.06% | 0.00% | 4.27% |
JAKVX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 | 7.47% | 8.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HHCZX and JAKVX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JAKVX has higher volatility (2.43%) compared to HHCZX (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HHCZX dropped -33.57% vs JAKVX's -5.16%.
JAKVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.67 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HHCZX and JAKVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer