PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HGY.TO vs. XSH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HGY.TO vs. XSH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Gold Yield ETF (HGY.TO) and iShares Core Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond Index ETF (XSH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HGY.TO achieves a 1.16% return, which is significantly lower than XSH.TO's 1.33% return. Over the past 10 years, HGY.TO has outperformed XSH.TO with an annualized return of 9.42%, while XSH.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 2.82% annualized return.


HGY.TO

1D
-0.83%
1M
-1.36%
YTD
1.16%
6M
3.23%
1Y
23.98%
3Y*
24.16%
5Y*
13.84%
10Y*
9.42%

XSH.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
1.13%
YTD
1.33%
6M
1.34%
1Y
3.85%
3Y*
6.05%
5Y*
2.86%
10Y*
2.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HGY.TO vs. XSH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HGY.TO
Global X Gold Yield ETF
1.16%48.66%21.36%9.51%-1.07%-4.51%18.67%13.62%-3.58%8.33%
XSH.TO
iShares Core Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond Index ETF
1.33%4.61%7.11%6.80%-4.52%-0.81%6.28%5.02%1.28%0.78%

Correlation

The correlation between HGY.TO and XSH.TO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2011

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HGY.TO vs. XSH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HGY.TO
HGY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
HGY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
HGY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

XSH.TO
XSH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
XSH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
XSH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HGY.TO vs. XSH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold Yield ETF (HGY.TO) and iShares Core Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond Index ETF (XSH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HGY.TOXSH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.36

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

2.57

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.70

10.05

-6.35

HGY.TO vs. XSH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HGY.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the XSH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HGY.TO and XSH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HGY.TOXSH.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

1.79

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

1.02

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.64

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.74

-0.67

Drawdowns

HGY.TO vs. XSH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HGY.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.53%, which is greater than XSH.TO's maximum drawdown of -14.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HGY.TO and XSH.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HGY.TOXSH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.53%

-14.24%

-25.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.47%

-1.51%

-15.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.47%

-1.51%

-15.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.32%

-7.80%

-10.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.31%

-14.24%

-6.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.54%

0.00%

-15.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.79%

-0.93%

-16.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.50%

0.38%

+6.12%

Volatility

HGY.TO vs. XSH.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Gold Yield ETF (HGY.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.22% compared to iShares Core Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond Index ETF (XSH.TO) at 0.80%. This indicates that HGY.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HGY.TOXSH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.22%

0.80%

+6.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.71%

1.83%

+18.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.45%

2.16%

+21.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.57%

2.83%

+12.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.45%

4.42%

+11.03%

HGY.TO vs. XSH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HGY.TO has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than XSH.TO's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

HGY.TO vs. XSH.TO - Dividend Comparison

HGY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.13%, more than XSH.TO's 3.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HGY.TO
Global X Gold Yield ETF
6.13%4.92%5.32%6.10%6.42%5.87%5.72%4.19%4.66%4.63%5.37%6.13%
XSH.TO
iShares Core Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond Index ETF
3.89%3.82%3.64%3.24%2.97%2.65%2.61%2.80%2.86%2.93%3.08%3.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


HGY.TO and XSH.TO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSH.TO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSH.TO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for HGY.TO.

HGY.TO is categorized as Gold, while XSH.TO is Canadian Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for HGY.TO and 0.10% for XSH.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HGY.TO and XSH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer