PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSH.TO vs. ZAG.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XSH.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond Index ETF (XSH.TO) and BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XSH.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSH.TO
iShares Core Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond Index ETF
0.19%4.61%7.11%6.80%-4.52%-0.81%6.28%5.02%1.28%0.78%
ZAG.TO
BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF
0.04%2.25%4.48%6.41%-11.60%-2.60%8.34%6.84%1.12%2.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSH.TO achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly higher than ZAG.TO's 0.04% return. Over the past 10 years, XSH.TO has outperformed ZAG.TO with an annualized return of 2.78%, while ZAG.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.66% annualized return.


XSH.TO

1D
0.26%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
0.19%
6M
0.69%
1Y
3.33%
3Y*
5.53%
5Y*
2.68%
10Y*
2.78%

ZAG.TO

1D
0.15%
1M
-2.08%
YTD
0.04%
6M
-0.26%
1Y
0.56%
3Y*
3.34%
5Y*
0.58%
10Y*
1.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XSH.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSH.TO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than ZAG.TO's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XSH.TO vs. ZAG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSH.TO
XSH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XSH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XSH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

ZAG.TO
ZAG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
ZAG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSH.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond Index ETF (XSH.TO) and BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSH.TOZAG.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.62

0.12

+1.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.23

0.19

+2.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.02

+0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

0.30

+1.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.41

0.60

+8.82

XSH.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the ZAG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSH.TO and ZAG.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSH.TOZAG.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

0.12

+1.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.09

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.24

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.44

+0.28

Correlation

The correlation between XSH.TO and ZAG.TO is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XSH.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Dividend Comparison

XSH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, more than ZAG.TO's 3.48% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XSH.TO
iShares Core Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond Index ETF
3.89%3.82%3.64%3.24%2.97%2.65%2.61%2.80%2.86%2.93%3.08%3.18%
ZAG.TO
BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF
3.48%3.48%3.44%3.47%3.56%3.04%2.88%3.03%2.92%2.95%3.07%3.13%

Drawdowns

XSH.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSH.TO drawdown since its inception was -14.24%, smaller than the maximum ZAG.TO drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSH.TO and ZAG.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XSH.TOZAG.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.24%

-18.03%

+3.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.51%

-2.84%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.80%

-15.77%

+7.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.24%

-18.03%

+3.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-2.71%

+1.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.93%

-3.56%

+2.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

1.41%

-1.05%

Volatility

XSH.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond Index ETF (XSH.TO) is 1.15%, while BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO) has a volatility of 1.90%. This indicates that XSH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZAG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XSH.TOZAG.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.15%

1.90%

-0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.52%

2.96%

-1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06%

4.65%

-2.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.79%

6.53%

-3.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.42%

7.09%

-2.67%