HGY.TO vs. JNK
HGY.TO (Global X Gold Yield ETF) and JNK (SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HGY.TO is a Gold fund actively managed by Global X, while JNK is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Barclays Capital High Yield Very Liquid Index. HGY.TO is actively managed, while JNK is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HGY.TO returned 9.42%/yr vs 5.77%/yr for JNK. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. HGY.TO charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for JNK.
Performance
HGY.TO vs. JNK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HGY.TO is traded in CAD, while JNK is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the JNK values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HGY.TO achieves a 1.16% return, which is significantly lower than JNK's 2.80% return. Over the past 10 years, HGY.TO has outperformed JNK with an annualized return of 9.42%, while JNK has yielded a comparatively lower 5.77% annualized return.
HGY.TO
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- 1.16%
- 6M
- 3.23%
- 1Y
- 23.98%
- 3Y*
- 24.16%
- 5Y*
- 13.84%
- 10Y*
- 9.42%
JNK
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- YTD
- 2.80%
- 6M
- 1.58%
- 1Y
- 8.62%
- 3Y*
- 9.89%
- 5Y*
- 6.65%
- 10Y*
- 5.77%
HGY.TO vs. JNK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HGY.TO Global X Gold Yield ETF | 1.16% | 48.66% | 21.36% | 9.51% | -1.07% | -4.51% | 18.67% | 13.62% | -3.58% | 8.33% |
JNK SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF | 2.80% | 3.77% | 16.96% | 9.94% | -5.94% | 3.06% | 3.17% | 9.23% | 4.93% | -0.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between HGY.TO and JNK is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2010 | -0.14 |
HGY.TO vs. JNK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HGY.TO
JNK
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
HGY.TO
JNK
-
Basic Materials
HGY.TO
-
JNK
-
Communication Services
HGY.TO
-
JNK
-
Consumer Cyclical
HGY.TO
-
JNK
-
Consumer Defensive
HGY.TO
-
JNK
-
Energy
HGY.TO
-
JNK
Healthcare
HGY.TO
-
JNK
-
Industrials
HGY.TO
-
JNK
-
Real Estate
HGY.TO
-
JNK
-
Technology
HGY.TO
-
JNK
Utilities
HGY.TO
-
JNK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HGY.TO vs. JNK — Risk / Return Rank
HGY.TO
JNK
HGY.TO vs. JNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold Yield ETF (HGY.TO) and SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HGY.TO | JNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.31 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 2.56 | -1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.70 | 7.21 | -3.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HGY.TO | JNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 1.67 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 0.92 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.72 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.91 | -0.84 |
Drawdowns
HGY.TO vs. JNK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HGY.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.53%, which is greater than JNK's maximum drawdown of -15.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HGY.TO and JNK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HGY.TO | JNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.53% | -15.75% | -23.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.47% | -3.38% | -14.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.47% | -7.77% | -9.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.32% | -14.90% | -3.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.31% | -15.75% | -4.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.54% | 0.00% | -15.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.79% | -2.35% | -15.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.50% | 1.20% | +5.30% |
Volatility
HGY.TO vs. JNK - Volatility Comparison
Global X Gold Yield ETF (HGY.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.22% compared to SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) at 1.16%. This indicates that HGY.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HGY.TO | JNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.22% | 1.16% | +6.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.71% | 4.16% | +16.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.45% | 5.20% | +18.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 7.26% | +8.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.45% | 8.03% | +7.42% |
HGY.TO vs. JNK - Expense Ratio Comparison
HGY.TO has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than JNK's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
HGY.TO vs. JNK - Dividend Comparison
HGY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.13%, less than JNK's 6.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HGY.TO Global X Gold Yield ETF | 6.13% | 4.92% | 5.32% | 6.10% | 6.42% | 5.87% | 5.72% | 4.19% | 4.66% | 4.63% | 5.37% | 6.13% |
JNK SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF | 6.62% | 6.54% | 6.63% | 6.38% | 6.06% | 4.27% | 5.11% | 5.44% | 5.90% | 5.60% | 6.06% | 6.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HGY.TO and JNK have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JNK is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JNK is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for HGY.TO.
HGY.TO is categorized as Gold, while JNK is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for HGY.TO and 0.40% for JNK.
Find the right allocation for HGY.TO and JNK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer