HGY.TO vs. AGCC.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HGY.TO (Global X Gold Yield ETF) and AGCC.TO (Global X Silver Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HGY.TO is a Gold fund actively managed by Global X, while AGCC.TO is a Silver fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HGY.TO charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for AGCC.TO.

Performance

HGY.TO vs. AGCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Gold Yield ETF (HGY.TO) and Global X Silver Covered Call ETF (AGCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HGY.TO achieves a 1.16% return, which is significantly lower than AGCC.TO's 1.95% return.

HGY.TO

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: -1.36%
• YTD: 1.16%
• 6M: 3.23%
• 1Y: 23.98%
• 3Y*: 24.16%
• 5Y*: 13.84%
• 10Y*: 9.42%

AGCC.TO

• 1D: -2.45%
• 1M: 1.43%
• YTD: 1.95%
• 6M: 19.93%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HGY.TO vs. AGCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HGY.TO Global X Gold Yield ETF	1.16%	5.34%
AGCC.TO Global X Silver Covered Call ETF	1.95%	37.24%

Correlation

The correlation between HGY.TO and AGCC.TO is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025	0.74

Return for Risk

HGY.TO vs. AGCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HGY.TO

HGY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 28
HGY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
HGY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
HGY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 31
HGY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
HGY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HGY.TO vs. AGCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold Yield ETF (HGY.TO) and Global X Silver Covered Call ETF (AGCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HGY.TO	AGCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.03	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.42	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.38	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.70	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HGY.TO	AGCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.03	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	1.06	-0.99

Drawdowns

HGY.TO vs. AGCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HGY.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.53%, roughly equal to the maximum AGCC.TO drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HGY.TO and AGCC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HGY.TO	AGCC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.53%	-39.17%	-0.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.47%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.47%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.32%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.54%	-32.43%	+16.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.79%	-16.63%	-1.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.50%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HGY.TO	AGCC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.22%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.71%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.45%	64.60%	-41.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.57%	64.60%	-49.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.45%	64.60%	-49.15%

HGY.TO vs. AGCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HGY.TO has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than AGCC.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

HGY.TO vs. AGCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

HGY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.13%, more than AGCC.TO's 5.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AGCC.TO Global X Silver Covered Call ETF	5.55%	1.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HGY.TO Global X Gold Yield ETF	6.13%	4.92%	5.32%	6.10%	6.42%	5.87%	5.72%	4.19%	4.66%	4.63%	5.37%	6.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HGY.TO and AGCC.TO in my portfolio?

HGY.TO and AGCC.TO have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HGY.TO or AGCC.TO?

On fees, AGCC.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HGY.TO or AGCC.TO?

AGCC.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for HGY.TO.

What is the main difference between HGY.TO and AGCC.TO?

HGY.TO is categorized as Gold, while AGCC.TO is Silver. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for HGY.TO and 0.60% for AGCC.TO.