PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HGXIX vs. SGMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HGXIX vs. SGMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Global Impact Fund (HGXIX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund (SGMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HGXIX achieves a 15.86% return, which is significantly higher than SGMAX's 12.74% return.


HGXIX

1D
1.20%
1M
0.94%
6M
9.77%
YTD
15.86%
1Y
15.86%
3Y*
13.19%
5Y*
3.55%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.09%

SGMAX

1D
0.31%
1M
3.47%
6M
8.91%
YTD
12.74%
1Y
20.14%
3Y*
16.79%
5Y*
11.02%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

HGXIX vs. SGMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HGXIX
Hartford Global Impact Fund
15.86%9.62%7.78%13.19%-22.53%10.86%31.37%27.97%-10.10%23.00%
SGMAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund
12.74%17.93%15.18%8.86%-3.41%18.94%-2.71%20.58%-4.41%12.53%

Correlation

The correlation between HGXIX and SGMAX is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2017

0.75

The correlation between HGXIX and SGMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HGXIX vs. SGMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HGXIX
HGXIX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
HGXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
HGXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

SGMAX
SGMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SGMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SGMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HGXIX vs. SGMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Global Impact Fund (HGXIX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund (SGMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HGXIXSGMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.53

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

3.66

-2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.87

14.41

-9.54

HGXIX vs. SGMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HGXIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the SGMAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HGXIX and SGMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HGXIX vs. SGMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HGXIX drawdown since its inception was -36.01%, which is greater than SGMAX's maximum drawdown of -31.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HGXIX and SGMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HGXIXSGMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.01%

-31.27%

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.61%

-5.88%

-4.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.74%

-11.57%

-4.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.08%

-22.11%

-9.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

0.00%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.77%

-4.74%

-4.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

1.49%

+2.05%

Volatility

HGXIX vs. SGMAX - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Global Impact Fund (HGXIX) has a higher volatility of 4.10% compared to SEI Institutional Investments Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund (SGMAX) at 1.87%. This indicates that HGXIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HGXIXSGMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.10%

1.87%

+2.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.32%

5.76%

+6.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.03%

7.51%

+7.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.75%

13.76%

+2.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.38%

14.12%

+3.26%

HGXIX vs. SGMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HGXIX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than SGMAX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

HGXIX vs. SGMAX - Dividend Comparison

HGXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than SGMAX's 12.90% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
HGXIX
Hartford Global Impact Fund
0.47%0.54%0.00%0.97%0.78%2.85%0.69%0.71%14.85%4.04%
SGMAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund
12.90%14.55%12.63%6.40%11.12%15.38%2.06%4.81%7.86%4.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


HGXIX and SGMAX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HGXIX has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to SGMAX (1.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HGXIX dropped -36.01% vs SGMAX's -31.27%.

SGMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HGXIX and SGMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer