PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HGXIX vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HGXIX vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Global Impact Fund (HGXIX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HGXIX vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HGXIX
Hartford Global Impact Fund
-1.13%9.62%7.78%13.19%-22.53%10.86%31.37%27.97%-10.10%23.00%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
-3.95%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%13.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HGXIX achieves a -1.13% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -3.95% return.


HGXIX

1D
2.98%
1M
-6.96%
YTD
-1.13%
6M
-4.48%
1Y
8.66%
3Y*
8.38%
5Y*
2.18%
10Y*

^GSPC

1D
0.72%
1M
-4.45%
YTD
-3.95%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
16.73%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HGXIX vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HGXIX
HGXIX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
HGXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
HGXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HGXIX vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Global Impact Fund (HGXIX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HGXIX^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.54

0.92

-0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.87

1.41

-0.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.21

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

1.41

-0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.54

6.61

-4.08

HGXIX vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HGXIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HGXIX and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HGXIX^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

0.92

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.61

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.46

+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between HGXIX and ^GSPC is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Drawdowns

HGXIX vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HGXIX drawdown since its inception was -36.01%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HGXIX and ^GSPC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HGXIX^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.01%

-56.78%

+20.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.67%

-12.14%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.08%

-25.43%

-6.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.94%

-5.78%

-2.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.04%

-10.75%

+1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.58%

2.60%

+0.98%

Volatility

HGXIX vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Global Impact Fund (HGXIX) has a higher volatility of 6.49% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 5.37%. This indicates that HGXIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HGXIX^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.49%

5.37%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.43%

9.55%

+0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.76%

18.33%

-1.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.44%

16.90%

-0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.40%

18.05%

-0.65%