HGXIX vs. ^GSPC
HGXIX (Hartford Global Impact Fund) is Global Equities fund managed by Hartford, while ^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index. Over the past 5 years, HGXIX returned 3.27%/yr vs 11.44%/yr for ^GSPC. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
HGXIX vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HGXIX achieves a 12.16% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 7.49% return.
HGXIX
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 12.16%
- 6M
- 11.11%
- 1Y
- 13.24%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 3.27%
- 10Y*
- —
^GSPC
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- YTD
- 7.49%
- 6M
- 6.15%
- 1Y
- 20.78%
- 3Y*
- 19.17%
- 5Y*
- 11.44%
- 10Y*
- 13.70%
HGXIX vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HGXIX Hartford Global Impact Fund | 12.16% | 9.62% | 7.78% | 13.19% | -22.53% | 10.86% | 31.37% | 27.97% | -10.10% | 23.00% |
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 7.49% | 16.39% | 23.31% | 24.23% | -19.44% | 26.89% | 16.26% | 28.88% | -6.24% | 12.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between HGXIX and ^GSPC is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2017 | 0.85 |
The correlation between HGXIX and ^GSPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HGXIX vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank
HGXIX
^GSPC
HGXIX vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Global Impact Fund (HGXIX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HGXIX | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.30 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 2.29 | -0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.14 | 10.15 | -6.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HGXIX vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HGXIX drawdown since its inception was -36.01%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HGXIX and ^GSPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HGXIX | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.01% | -56.78% | +20.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.61% | -9.10% | -1.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.74% | -18.90% | +3.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.08% | -25.43% | -6.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.23% | -3.31% | +1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.86% | -10.71% | +1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.52% | 2.05% | +1.47% |
Volatility
HGXIX vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
Hartford Global Impact Fund (HGXIX) has a higher volatility of 5.51% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 4.87%. This indicates that HGXIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HGXIX | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.51% | 4.87% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.92% | 9.90% | +2.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.73% | 12.54% | +2.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 17.00% | -0.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.42% | 18.08% | -0.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HGXIX and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HGXIX has higher volatility (5.51%) compared to ^GSPC (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HGXIX dropped -36.01% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.
^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HGXIX and ^GSPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer