HGER vs. RPV

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

HGER (Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF) and RPV (Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HGER is a Commodities fund tracking the Quantix Commodity Index - Benchmark TR Net, while RPV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HGER returned 19.99%/yr vs 17.39%/yr for RPV. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HGER charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RPV.

Performance

HGER vs. RPV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) and Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HGER achieves a 24.74% return, which is significantly higher than RPV's 11.02% return.

HGER

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: -4.74%
• YTD: 24.74%
• 6M: 24.88%
• 1Y: 37.35%
• 3Y*: 19.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RPV

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 2.97%
• YTD: 11.02%
• 6M: 13.06%
• 1Y: 28.29%
• 3Y*: 17.39%
• 5Y*: 9.71%
• 10Y*: 10.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HGER vs. RPV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF	24.74%	20.08%	9.25%	1.93%	9.77%
RPV Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF	11.02%	17.70%	12.41%	7.98%	-6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between HGER and RPV is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2022	0.17

The correlation between HGER and RPV shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HGER vs. RPV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HGER	RPV
Basic Materials	103.6%	9.0%
Communication Services	-	5.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	15.2%
Energy	-	11.3%
Financial Services	-	17.9%
Healthcare	-	16.2%
Industrials	-	6.3%
Real Estate	-	1.4%
Technology	-	2.8%
Utilities	-	4.0%

Return for Risk

HGER vs. RPV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HGER

HGER Risk / Return Rank: 78
HGER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
HGER Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
HGER Omega Ratio Rank: 76
HGER Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
HGER Martin Ratio Rank: 82

RPV

RPV Risk / Return Rank: 77
RPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
RPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
RPV Omega Ratio Rank: 74
RPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
RPV Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HGER vs. RPV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) and Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HGER	RPV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	2.26	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.88	3.27	-0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.39	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.64	3.67	+0.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.85	12.85	+2.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HGER vs. RPV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HGER Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the RPV Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HGER and RPV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HGER	RPV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.20	2.26	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	0.38	+0.48

Drawdowns

HGER vs. RPV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HGER drawdown since its inception was -23.31%, smaller than the maximum RPV drawdown of -75.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HGER and RPV.

Drawdown Indicators

	HGER	RPV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.31%	-75.32%	+52.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.09%	-7.74%	-0.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.84%	-15.50%	+6.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.64%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-50.67%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.50%	-0.43%	-7.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.65%	-10.68%	+3.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.52%	2.21%	+0.31%

Volatility

HGER vs. RPV - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) at 2.50%. This indicates that HGER's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HGER	RPV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.49%	2.50%	+1.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.77%	8.55%	+6.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.09%	12.58%	+4.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.64%	17.88%	-0.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.64%	21.92%	-4.28%

HGER vs. RPV - Expense Ratio Comparison

HGER has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than RPV's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

HGER vs. RPV - Dividend Comparison

HGER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, more than RPV's 2.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF	5.68%	7.09%	3.28%	7.24%	0.64%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RPV Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF	2.27%	2.50%	2.16%	2.38%	2.29%	1.92%	2.11%	2.28%	2.49%	1.73%	1.73%	2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HGER and RPV in my portfolio?

HGER and RPV have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HGER or RPV?

HGER has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to RPV (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HGER dropped -23.31% vs RPV's -75.32%.

Which ETF is better, HGER or RPV?

On 3-year performance, HGER leads with 19.99% vs 17.39% for RPV. On fees, RPV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RPV has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HGER or RPV?

Over the 3-year period, HGER has performed better with a 19.99% return vs 17.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HGER or RPV?

RPV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for HGER.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HGER or RPV?

HGER has the higher dividend yield at 5.68%, compared with 2.27% for RPV.

What is the main difference between HGER and RPV?

HGER is categorized as Commodities, while RPV is Large Cap Value Equities. HGER tracks Quantix Commodity Index - Benchmark TR Net, while RPV tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for HGER and 0.35% for RPV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RPV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.