PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
HG=F vs. SCCO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


HG=FSCCO
YTD Return14.69%29.01%
1Y Return17.77%56.42%
3Y Return (Ann)1.32%26.09%
5Y Return (Ann)10.55%29.23%
10Y Return (Ann)3.08%16.79%
Sharpe Ratio0.681.69
Daily Std Dev19.53%34.85%
Max Drawdown-62.54%-78.59%
Current Drawdown-13.06%-14.95%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between HG=F and SCCO is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

HG=F vs. SCCO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, HG=F achieves a 14.69% return, which is significantly lower than SCCO's 29.01% return. Over the past 10 years, HG=F has underperformed SCCO with an annualized return of 3.08%, while SCCO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.79% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%500.00%1,000.00%1,500.00%2,000.00%2,500.00%FebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJuly
81.10%
2,196.73%
HG=F
SCCO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Copper

Southern Copper Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

HG=F vs. SCCO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Copper (HG=F) and Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HG=F
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HG=F, currently valued at 0.68, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.000.68
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for HG=F, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.001.08
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for HG=F, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.301.401.13
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for HG=F, currently valued at 0.47, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.000.47
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for HG=F, currently valued at 1.98, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.001.98
SCCO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SCCO, currently valued at 1.01, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.001.01
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SCCO, currently valued at 1.64, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.001.64
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SCCO, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.301.401.20
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SCCO, currently valued at 1.73, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.001.73
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SCCO, currently valued at 3.34, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.003.34

HG=F vs. SCCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HG=F Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the SCCO Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of HG=F and SCCO.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00FebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJuly
0.68
1.01
HG=F
SCCO

Drawdowns

HG=F vs. SCCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HG=F drawdown since its inception was -62.54%, smaller than the maximum SCCO drawdown of -78.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HG=F and SCCO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%FebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJuly
-13.06%
-14.95%
HG=F
SCCO

Volatility

HG=F vs. SCCO - Volatility Comparison

Copper (HG=F) and Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) have volatilities of 5.87% and 5.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%FebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJuly
5.87%
5.61%
HG=F
SCCO