HG vs. WRB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd. (HG) and W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB).

Performance

HG vs. WRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd. (HG) and W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HG vs. WRB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HG Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd.	14.41%	46.61%	27.29%	-0.33%
WRB W. R. Berkley Corporation	-5.36%	23.02%	27.19%	4.67%

Fundamentals

EPS HG : $8.53 WRB : $4.76
PE Ratio HG : 3.50 WRB : 13.92
PEG Ratio HG : 0.07 WRB : 0.34
PS Ratio HG : 0.68 WRB : 1.81
Total Revenue (TTM) HG : $2.95B WRB : $14.65B
Gross Profit (TTM) HG : $2.89B WRB : $3.07B
EBITDA (TTM) HG : $1.31B WRB : $2.52B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HG achieves a 14.41% return, which is significantly higher than WRB's -5.36% return.

HG

• 1D: 2.12%
• 1M: 1.05%
• YTD: 14.41%
• 6M: 28.71%
• 1Y: 53.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WRB

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: -7.56%
• YTD: -5.36%
• 6M: -12.00%
• 1Y: -4.37%
• 3Y*: 19.72%
• 5Y*: 17.04%
• 10Y*: 17.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

HG vs. WRB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HG

HG Risk / Return Rank: 86
HG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
HG Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
HG Omega Ratio Rank: 83
HG Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
HG Martin Ratio Rank: 88

WRB

WRB Risk / Return Rank: 31
WRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
WRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
WRB Omega Ratio Rank: 28
WRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
WRB Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HG vs. WRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd. (HG) and W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HG	WRB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	-0.20	+1.97
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	-0.12	+2.55
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	0.98	+0.32
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	-0.28	+3.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.43	-0.63	+10.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HG vs. WRB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HG Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the WRB Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HG and WRB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HG	WRB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.77	-0.20	+1.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.76	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.19	0.59	+0.60

Correlation

The correlation between HG and WRB is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

HG vs. WRB - Dividend Comparison

HG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, more than WRB's 2.81% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HG Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd.	6.70%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WRB W. R. Berkley Corporation	2.81%	2.64%	2.39%	2.73%	1.22%	2.44%	0.71%	2.43%	2.83%	2.16%	2.27%	0.86%

Drawdowns

HG vs. WRB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HG drawdown since its inception was -21.07%, smaller than the maximum WRB drawdown of -69.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HG and WRB.

Drawdown Indicators

	HG	WRB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.07%	-69.33%	+48.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.84%	-16.39%	-1.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.29%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-14.07%	+14.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.55%	-14.58%	+9.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.26%	7.20%	-1.94%

Volatility

HG vs. WRB - Volatility Comparison

Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd. (HG) has a higher volatility of 7.13% compared to W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) at 5.86%. This indicates that HG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WRB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HG	WRB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.13%	5.86%	+1.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.13%	16.42%	+3.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.83%	22.15%	+8.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.75%	22.59%	+9.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.75%	24.43%	+7.32%

Financials