HFXI vs. KEMX
HFXI (IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF) and KEMX (KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - HFXI tracks the FTSE Developed ex North America 50% Hedged to USD Index while KEMX tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HFXI returned 12.14%/yr vs 13.52%/yr for KEMX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HFXI charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for KEMX.
Performance
HFXI vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HFXI achieves a 17.13% return, which is significantly lower than KEMX's 42.26% return.
HFXI
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 7.03%
- YTD
- 17.13%
- 6M
- 20.26%
- 1Y
- 35.26%
- 3Y*
- 20.46%
- 5Y*
- 12.14%
- 10Y*
- 11.47%
KEMX
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- 13.02%
- YTD
- 42.26%
- 6M
- 47.92%
- 1Y
- 79.97%
- 3Y*
- 29.66%
- 5Y*
- 13.52%
- 10Y*
- —
HFXI vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFXI IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF | 17.13% | 30.10% | 7.58% | 19.56% | -10.71% | 13.96% | 6.88% | 9.09% |
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 42.26% | 38.28% | 0.36% | 20.57% | -19.35% | 10.55% | 12.84% | 7.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between HFXI and KEMX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2019 | 0.77 |
The correlation between HFXI and KEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
HFXI vs. KEMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HFXI
KEMX
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
HFXI
KEMX
Industrials
HFXI
KEMX
Technology
HFXI
KEMX
Healthcare
HFXI
KEMX
Consumer Cyclical
HFXI
KEMX
Consumer Defensive
HFXI
KEMX
Basic Materials
HFXI
KEMX
Energy
HFXI
KEMX
Utilities
HFXI
KEMX
Communication Services
HFXI
KEMX
Real Estate
HFXI
KEMX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HFXI vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank
HFXI
KEMX
HFXI vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HFXI | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.62 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 5.24 | -1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.97 | 20.86 | -7.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HFXI | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 3.59 | -1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.75 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.68 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
HFXI vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFXI drawdown since its inception was -32.42%, smaller than the maximum KEMX drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFXI and KEMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFXI | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.42% | -38.80% | +6.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.84% | -15.36% | +4.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.52% | -19.62% | +6.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.35% | -30.85% | +8.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -1.31% | +0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.46% | -8.86% | +3.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 3.85% | -1.13% |
Volatility
HFXI vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI) is 5.46%, while KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that HFXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HFXI | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | 9.86% | -4.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.40% | 19.90% | -7.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.69% | 22.40% | -7.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.85% | 18.21% | -3.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 20.94% | -4.31% |
HFXI vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFXI has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HFXI vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison
HFXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, more than KEMX's 2.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFXI IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF | 3.84% | 4.19% | 2.68% | 2.49% | 4.65% | 3.10% | 2.00% | 3.19% | 4.33% | 2.56% | 2.71% | 0.78% |
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 2.31% | 3.28% | 3.39% | 2.00% | 4.10% | 4.79% | 1.69% | 2.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HFXI and KEMX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KEMX has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to HFXI (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFXI dropped -32.42% vs KEMX's -38.80%.
On 5-year performance, KEMX leads with 13.52% vs 12.14% for HFXI. On fees, HFXI is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, HFXI has been the lower-risk option at 5.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 13.52% return vs 12.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HFXI is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for KEMX.
HFXI has the higher dividend yield at 3.84%, compared with 2.31% for KEMX.
HFXI tracks FTSE Developed ex North America 50% Hedged to USD Index, while KEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: New York Life and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HFXI and 0.25% for KEMX.
KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HFXI and KEMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer