HFXI vs. CGDV
HFXI (IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF) and CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HFXI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex North America 50% Hedged to USD Index, while CGDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. HFXI is passively managed, while CGDV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HFXI returned 19.41%/yr vs 24.27%/yr for CGDV. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HFXI charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CGDV.
Performance
HFXI vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HFXI achieves a 14.20% return, which is significantly higher than CGDV's 10.15% return.
HFXI
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- YTD
- 14.20%
- 6M
- 17.07%
- 1Y
- 30.93%
- 3Y*
- 19.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.57%
- 10Y*
- 11.43%
CGDV
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- YTD
- 10.15%
- 6M
- 10.88%
- 1Y
- 27.58%
- 3Y*
- 24.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HFXI vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFXI IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF | 14.20% | 30.10% | 7.58% | 19.56% | -3.64% |
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 10.15% | 25.50% | 20.10% | 28.81% | -2.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between HFXI and CGDV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022 | 0.78 |
The correlation between HFXI and CGDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
HFXI vs. CGDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HFXI
CGDV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
HFXI
CGDV
Industrials
HFXI
CGDV
Technology
HFXI
CGDV
Healthcare
HFXI
CGDV
Consumer Cyclical
HFXI
CGDV
Consumer Defensive
HFXI
CGDV
Basic Materials
HFXI
CGDV
Energy
HFXI
CGDV
Utilities
HFXI
CGDV
Communication Services
HFXI
CGDV
Real Estate
HFXI
CGDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HFXI vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank
HFXI
CGDV
HFXI vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HFXI | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.44 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 2.84 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.31 | 13.37 | -2.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HFXI | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 2.34 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 1.21 | -0.65 |
Drawdowns
HFXI vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFXI drawdown since its inception was -32.42%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFXI and CGDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFXI | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.42% | -21.82% | -10.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.84% | -9.75% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.52% | -14.28% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.94% | -2.22% | -0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.45% | -3.61% | -1.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 2.07% | +0.67% |
Volatility
HFXI vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison
IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI) has a higher volatility of 5.75% compared to Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) at 3.60%. This indicates that HFXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HFXI | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.75% | 3.60% | +2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.97% | 9.47% | +3.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.17% | 11.85% | +3.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 15.51% | -0.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.67% | 15.51% | +1.16% |
HFXI vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFXI has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
HFXI vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison
HFXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, more than CGDV's 1.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 1.19% | 1.29% | 1.60% | 1.65% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HFXI IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF | 3.94% | 4.19% | 2.68% | 2.49% | 4.65% | 3.10% | 2.00% | 3.19% | 4.33% | 2.56% | 2.71% | 0.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HFXI and CGDV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HFXI has higher volatility (5.75%) compared to CGDV (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFXI dropped -32.42% vs CGDV's -21.82%.
On 3-year performance, CGDV leads with 24.27% vs 19.41% for HFXI. On fees, HFXI is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CGDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 24.27% return vs 19.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HFXI is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CGDV.
HFXI has the higher dividend yield at 3.94%, compared with 1.19% for CGDV.
HFXI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while CGDV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: New York Life and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HFXI and 0.33% for CGDV.
CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HFXI and CGDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer