HFSP vs. SENT
HFSP (TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF) and SENT (AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF) are both Long-Short funds. HFSP is actively managed, while SENT is passively managed. Over the past year, HFSP returned -14.56% vs 0.00% for SENT. HFSP charges 1.25%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for SENT.
Performance
HFSP vs. SENT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HFSP
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- -5.81%
- 6M
- -4.27%
- 1Y
- -14.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SENT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 0.00%
- 3Y*
- -3.03%
- 5Y*
- -4.51%
- 10Y*
- —
HFSP vs. SENT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HFSP TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF | -5.81% | -24.01% | 1.15% |
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HFSP vs. SENT — Risk / Return Rank
HFSP
SENT
HFSP vs. SENT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HFSP | SENT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HFSP | SENT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.75 | -0.25 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
HFSP vs. SENT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFSP drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, which is greater than SENT's maximum drawdown of -30.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFSP and SENT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFSP | SENT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.80% | -30.34% | -3.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.64% | 0.00% | -24.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.12% | -27.23% | -4.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.02% | -20.90% | +3.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.04% | 0.00% | +14.04% |
Volatility
HFSP vs. SENT - Volatility Comparison
TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) at 0.00%. This indicates that HFSP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SENT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HFSP | SENT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.01% | 0.00% | +5.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.44% | 0.00% | +12.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.93% | 0.00% | +20.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.48% | 12.66% | +11.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.48% | 13.32% | +11.16% |
HFSP vs. SENT - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFSP has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SENT's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
HFSP vs. SENT - Dividend Comparison
Neither HFSP nor SENT has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HFSP TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.53% |
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HFSP has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to SENT (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFSP dropped -33.80% vs SENT's -30.34%.
On 1-year performance, SENT leads with 0.00% vs -14.56% for HFSP. On fees, SENT is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, SENT has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SENT has performed better with a 0.00% return vs -14.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SENT is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for HFSP.
HFSP and SENT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: TradersAI and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for HFSP and 1.01% for SENT.
Find the right allocation for HFSP and SENT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer