HFSP vs. RSEE

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

HFSP (TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF) and RSEE (Rareview Systematic Equity ETF) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HFSP returned -22.75% vs 27.09% for RSEE. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HFSP charges 1.25%/yr vs 1.27%/yr for RSEE.

Performance

HFSP vs. RSEE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP) and Rareview Systematic Equity ETF (RSEE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFSP achieves a -9.94% return, which is significantly lower than RSEE's 13.07% return.

HFSP

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -2.83%
• 6M: -13.71%
• YTD: -9.94%
• 1Y: -22.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSEE

• 1D: -1.81%
• 1M: -0.74%
• 6M: 8.74%
• YTD: 13.07%
• 1Y: 27.09%
• 3Y*: 15.83%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFSP vs. RSEE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
HFSP TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF	-9.94%	-24.01%	0.75%
RSEE Rareview Systematic Equity ETF	13.07%	20.54%	0.45%

Correlation

The correlation between HFSP and RSEE is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2024	0.02

Return for Risk

HFSP vs. RSEE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFSP

HFSP Risk / Return Rank: 1
HFSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
HFSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
HFSP Omega Ratio Rank: 1
HFSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
HFSP Martin Ratio Rank: 2

RSEE

RSEE Risk / Return Rank: 53
RSEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
RSEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
RSEE Omega Ratio Rank: 49
RSEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
RSEE Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFSP vs. RSEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP) and Rareview Systematic Equity ETF (RSEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HFSP	RSEE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.30	1.43	-2.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.70	1.99	-3.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.78	1.25	-0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.86	2.11	-2.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.41	8.35	-9.76

HFSP vs. RSEE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFSP Sharpe Ratio is -1.30, which is lower than the RSEE Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFSP and RSEE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HFSP vs. RSEE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFSP drawdown since its inception was -35.57%, which is greater than RSEE's maximum drawdown of -21.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFSP and RSEE.

Drawdown Indicators

	HFSP	RSEE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.57%	-21.60%	-13.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.66%	-12.89%	-13.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.10%	-3.41%	-31.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.06%	-3.76%	-14.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.15%	3.25%	+12.90%

Volatility

HFSP vs. RSEE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP) is 5.41%, while Rareview Systematic Equity ETF (RSEE) has a volatility of 7.18%. This indicates that HFSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSEE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HFSP	RSEE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.41%	7.18%	-1.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.89%	15.90%	-3.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.53%	19.03%	-1.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.15%	19.21%	+4.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.15%	19.21%	+4.94%

HFSP vs. RSEE - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFSP has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is lower than RSEE's 1.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

HFSP vs. RSEE - Dividend Comparison

Neither HFSP nor RSEE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
HFSP TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF	0.00%	0.00%	1.53%	0.00%	0.00%
RSEE Rareview Systematic Equity ETF	0.00%	0.24%	9.02%	0.84%	1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HFSP and RSEE in my portfolio?

HFSP and RSEE have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HFSP or RSEE?

RSEE has higher volatility (7.18%) compared to HFSP (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFSP dropped -35.57% vs RSEE's -21.60%.

Which ETF is better, HFSP or RSEE?

On 1-year performance, RSEE leads with 27.09% vs -22.75% for HFSP. On fees, HFSP is cheaper at 1.25% per year. On volatility, HFSP has been the lower-risk option at 5.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HFSP or RSEE?

Over the 1-year period, RSEE has performed better with a 27.09% return vs -22.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HFSP or RSEE?

HFSP is cheaper with a 1.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.27% for RSEE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HFSP or RSEE?

HFSP and RSEE have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between HFSP and RSEE?

They also come from different issuers: TradersAI and Rareview Funds. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for HFSP and 1.27% for RSEE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSEE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.