PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFSP vs. JPO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFSP vs. JPO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP) and YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFSP achieves a -13.00% return, which is significantly lower than JPO's 8.98% return.


HFSP

1D
-2.86%
1M
-4.16%
6M
-13.42%
YTD
-13.00%
1Y
-26.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-20.56%

JPO

1D
0.34%
1M
5.47%
6M
14.60%
YTD
8.98%
1Y
19.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$263.78$441.47$507.97
$418.56K$404.33K$336.84K

HFSP vs. JPO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
HFSP
TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF
-13.00%-24.01%0.75%
JPO
YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF
8.98%22.26%3.03%

Correlation

The correlation between HFSP and JPO is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2024

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFSP vs. JPO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HFSP
HFSP Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
HFSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFSP Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
HFSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFSP Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

JPO
JPO Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
JPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPO Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
JPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPO Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HFSP vs. JPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP) and YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HFSPJPODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

1.16

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

1.21

-2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.52

3.00

-4.52

HFSP vs. JPO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFSP Sharpe Ratio is -1.48, which is lower than the JPO Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFSP and JPO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HFSP vs. JPO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFSP drawdown since its inception was -37.30%, which is greater than JPO's maximum drawdown of -24.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFSP and JPO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFSPJPODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.30%

-24.80%

-12.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.62%

-14.24%

-14.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.30%

-1.04%

-36.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.61%

-4.42%

-14.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.31%

5.72%

+11.59%

Volatility

HFSP vs. JPO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP) is 4.87%, while YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO) has a volatility of 5.21%. This indicates that HFSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFSPJPODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.87%

5.21%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.41%

14.08%

-1.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.81%

19.41%

-1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.00%

19.06%

+4.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.00%

19.06%

+4.94%

HFSP vs. JPO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFSP has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than JPO's 1.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFSP vs. JPO - Dividend Comparison

HFSP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.81%.


PositionTTM202520242023
HFSP
TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF
0.00%0.00%1.53%0.00%
JPO
YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF
31.81%34.13%25.15%4.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFSP and JPO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JPO has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to HFSP (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFSP dropped -37.30% vs JPO's -24.80%.

On 1-year performance, JPO leads with 19.08% vs -26.61% for HFSP. On fees, JPO is cheaper at 1.19% per year. On volatility, HFSP has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JPO has performed better with a 19.08% return vs -26.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPO is cheaper with a 1.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for HFSP.

JPO has the higher dividend yield at 31.81%, compared with 0.00% for HFSP.

HFSP is categorized as Long-Short, while JPO is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for HFSP and 1.19% for JPO.

JPO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs -1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFSP and JPO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer