HFSP vs. COMB
HFSP (TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF) and COMB (GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HFSP is a Long-Short fund actively managed by TradersAI, while COMB is a Commodities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HFSP returned -14.56% vs 38.86% for COMB. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. HFSP charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for COMB.
Performance
HFSP vs. COMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HFSP achieves a -5.81% return, which is significantly lower than COMB's 26.81% return.
HFSP
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- -5.81%
- 6M
- -4.27%
- 1Y
- -14.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMB
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -2.98%
- YTD
- 26.81%
- 6M
- 25.89%
- 1Y
- 38.86%
- 3Y*
- 16.31%
- 5Y*
- 11.27%
- 10Y*
- —
HFSP vs. COMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HFSP TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF | -5.81% | -24.01% | 1.15% |
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 26.81% | 15.12% | -0.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between HFSP and COMB is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2024 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HFSP vs. COMB — Risk / Return Rank
HFSP
COMB
HFSP vs. COMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HFSP | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.41 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 5.08 | -5.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | 13.24 | -14.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HFSP | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.70 | 2.29 | -2.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.75 | 0.52 | -1.27 |
Drawdowns
HFSP vs. COMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFSP drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, roughly equal to the maximum COMB drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFSP and COMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFSP | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.80% | -33.50% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.64% | -7.69% | -16.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.12% | -4.35% | -27.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.02% | -12.06% | -4.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.04% | 2.94% | +11.10% |
Volatility
HFSP vs. COMB - Volatility Comparison
TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) have volatilities of 5.01% and 5.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HFSP | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.01% | 5.14% | -0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.44% | 14.99% | -2.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.93% | 17.02% | +3.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.48% | 16.70% | +7.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.48% | 15.13% | +9.35% |
HFSP vs. COMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFSP has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than COMB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
HFSP vs. COMB - Dividend Comparison
HFSP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 7.14% | 9.05% | 2.48% | 6.57% | 30.85% | 15.83% | 0.07% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 0.20% |
HFSP TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HFSP and COMB have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMB has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to HFSP (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFSP dropped -33.80% vs COMB's -33.50%.
On 1-year performance, COMB leads with 38.86% vs -14.56% for HFSP. On fees, COMB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, HFSP has been the lower-risk option at 5.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, COMB has performed better with a 38.86% return vs -14.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COMB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for HFSP.
COMB has the higher dividend yield at 7.14%, compared with 0.00% for HFSP.
HFSP is categorized as Long-Short, while COMB is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: TradersAI and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for HFSP and 0.25% for COMB.
COMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HFSP and COMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer