HFSP vs. AIA
HFSP (TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF) and AIA (iShares Asia 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HFSP is a Long-Short fund actively managed by TradersAI, while AIA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the S&P Asia 50. HFSP is actively managed, while AIA is passively managed. Over the past year, HFSP returned -14.56% vs 100.69% for AIA. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. HFSP charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for AIA.
Performance
HFSP vs. AIA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HFSP achieves a -5.81% return, which is significantly lower than AIA's 52.67% return.
HFSP
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- -5.81%
- 6M
- -4.27%
- 1Y
- -14.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIA
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- 18.04%
- YTD
- 52.67%
- 6M
- 57.46%
- 1Y
- 100.69%
- 3Y*
- 38.58%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- 15.48%
HFSP vs. AIA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HFSP TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF | -5.81% | -24.01% | 1.15% |
AIA iShares Asia 50 ETF | 52.67% | 47.79% | -4.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between HFSP and AIA is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2024 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HFSP vs. AIA — Risk / Return Rank
HFSP
AIA
HFSP vs. AIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP) and iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HFSP | AIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.64 | -0.75 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 7.16 | -7.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | 26.55 | -27.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HFSP | AIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.70 | 3.94 | -4.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.75 | 0.32 | -1.08 |
Drawdowns
HFSP vs. AIA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFSP drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, smaller than the maximum AIA drawdown of -60.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFSP and AIA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFSP | AIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.80% | -60.89% | +27.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.64% | -14.15% | -10.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -50.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -54.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.12% | -1.19% | -30.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.02% | -16.68% | -0.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.04% | 3.81% | +10.23% |
Volatility
HFSP vs. AIA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP) is 5.01%, while iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) has a volatility of 11.22%. This indicates that HFSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HFSP | AIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.01% | 11.22% | -6.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.44% | 21.71% | -9.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.93% | 25.70% | -4.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.48% | 25.51% | -1.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.48% | 23.55% | +0.93% |
HFSP vs. AIA - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFSP has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than AIA's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
HFSP vs. AIA - Dividend Comparison
HFSP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIA iShares Asia 50 ETF | 1.64% | 2.50% | 2.78% | 2.07% | 2.59% | 1.54% | 1.11% | 2.24% | 2.49% | 1.45% | 2.29% | 2.88% |
HFSP TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HFSP and AIA have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIA has higher volatility (11.22%) compared to HFSP (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFSP dropped -33.80% vs AIA's -60.89%.
On 1-year performance, AIA leads with 100.69% vs -14.56% for HFSP. On fees, AIA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, HFSP has been the lower-risk option at 5.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AIA has performed better with a 100.69% return vs -14.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AIA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for HFSP.
AIA has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.00% for HFSP.
HFSP is categorized as Long-Short, while AIA is Asia Pacific Equities. They also come from different issuers: TradersAI and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for HFSP and 0.50% for AIA.
AIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.94 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HFSP and AIA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer