PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFSI vs. HFGO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFSI vs. HFGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI) and Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFSI achieves a 1.38% return, which is significantly lower than HFGO's 11.58% return.


HFSI

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.87%
YTD
1.38%
6M
1.51%
1Y
8.47%
3Y*
8.37%
5Y*
10Y*

HFGO

1D
-1.26%
1M
8.28%
YTD
11.58%
6M
10.04%
1Y
30.26%
3Y*
26.77%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFSI vs. HFGO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HFSI
Hartford Strategic Income ETF
1.38%9.56%7.91%9.91%-12.60%-0.13%
HFGO
Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF
11.58%15.52%40.73%42.45%-36.69%-5.15%

Correlation

The correlation between HFSI and HFGO is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2021

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFSI vs. HFGO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFSI
HFSI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
HFSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFSI Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
HFSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFSI Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

HFGO
HFGO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
HFGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFGO Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
HFGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFGO Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFSI vs. HFGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI) and Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HFSIHFGODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.29

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

1.66

+1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.13

5.35

+5.78

HFSI vs. HFGO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFSI Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the HFGO Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFSI and HFGO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HFSIHFGODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

1.69

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.39

+0.15

Drawdowns

HFSI vs. HFGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFSI drawdown since its inception was -19.34%, smaller than the maximum HFGO drawdown of -44.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFSI and HFGO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFSIHFGODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.34%

-44.64%

+25.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.06%

-18.29%

+15.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.11%

-25.19%

+20.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-1.36%

+1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.72%

-16.11%

+10.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

5.67%

-4.91%

Volatility

HFSI vs. HFGO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI) is 1.13%, while Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that HFSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFSIHFGODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

4.77%

-3.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.52%

13.91%

-11.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.58%

18.01%

-14.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.97%

25.91%

-20.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.97%

25.91%

-20.94%

HFSI vs. HFGO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFSI has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than HFGO's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFSI vs. HFGO - Dividend Comparison

HFSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%, while HFGO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
HFGO
Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HFSI
Hartford Strategic Income ETF
5.54%5.67%6.51%5.77%4.87%0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFSI and HFGO have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFGO has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to HFSI (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFSI dropped -19.34% vs HFGO's -44.64%.

On 3-year performance, HFGO leads with 26.77% vs 8.37% for HFSI. On fees, HFSI is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, HFSI has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HFGO has performed better with a 26.77% return vs 8.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HFSI is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HFGO.

HFSI has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 0.00% for HFGO.

HFSI is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while HFGO is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HFSI and 0.60% for HFGO.

HFSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFSI and HFGO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer