PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFRO vs. FMUAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFRO vs. FMUAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Highland Funds I - Highland Opportunities and Income Fund (HFRO) and Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund (FMUAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFRO achieves a 27.84% return, which is significantly higher than FMUAX's 6.51% return.


HFRO

1D
-1.07%
1M
2.76%
6M
20.97%
YTD
27.84%
1Y
52.46%
3Y*
3.03%
5Y*
1.17%
10Y*

FMUAX

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.78%
6M
5.31%
YTD
6.51%
1Y
14.70%
3Y*
9.70%
5Y*
4.98%
10Y*
6.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFRO vs. FMUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HFRO
Highland Funds I - Highland Opportunities and Income Fund
27.84%25.08%-27.17%-16.97%1.71%16.33%-8.42%4.22%-12.30%1.01%
FMUAX
Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund
6.51%9.00%8.70%9.81%-10.68%10.32%8.48%15.16%-5.24%2.21%

Correlation

The correlation between HFRO and FMUAX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFRO vs. FMUAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFRO
HFRO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
HFRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFRO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
HFRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFRO Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

FMUAX
FMUAX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FMUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FMUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFRO vs. FMUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Highland Funds I - Highland Opportunities and Income Fund (HFRO) and Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund (FMUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HFROFMUAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.57

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

3.72

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.10

17.99

-9.89

HFRO vs. FMUAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFRO Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the FMUAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFRO and FMUAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HFRO vs. FMUAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFRO drawdown since its inception was -52.79%, which is greater than FMUAX's maximum drawdown of -22.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFRO and FMUAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFROFMUAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.79%

-22.43%

-30.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.74%

-4.94%

-10.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.68%

-10.18%

-33.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.79%

-15.93%

-36.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.15%

-0.30%

-13.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.60%

-2.74%

-17.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.50%

0.95%

+5.55%

Volatility

HFRO vs. FMUAX - Volatility Comparison

Highland Funds I - Highland Opportunities and Income Fund (HFRO) has a higher volatility of 6.64% compared to Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund (FMUAX) at 1.57%. This indicates that HFRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFROFMUAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.64%

1.57%

+5.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.60%

4.84%

+10.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.80%

6.22%

+15.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.32%

7.21%

+16.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.52%

8.12%

+14.40%

HFRO vs. FMUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFRO has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than FMUAX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFRO vs. FMUAX - Dividend Comparison

HFRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, more than FMUAX's 1.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMUAX
Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund
1.42%1.23%2.01%2.53%2.25%4.56%2.12%4.00%7.98%2.17%2.36%2.80%
HFRO
Highland Funds I - Highland Opportunities and Income Fund
6.27%7.73%8.90%12.02%8.97%8.41%8.99%7.43%7.22%0.99%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFRO and FMUAX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFRO has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to FMUAX (1.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFRO dropped -52.79% vs FMUAX's -22.43%.

FMUAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFRO and FMUAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer