PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFRO vs. EKBAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFRO vs. EKBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Highland Funds I - Highland Opportunities and Income Fund (HFRO) and Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFRO achieves a 27.67% return, which is significantly lower than EKBAX's 38.34% return.


HFRO

1D
0.25%
1M
18.38%
YTD
27.67%
6M
28.39%
1Y
52.55%
3Y*
1.45%
5Y*
2.06%
10Y*

EKBAX

1D
1.16%
1M
9.53%
YTD
38.34%
6M
37.34%
1Y
62.84%
3Y*
32.50%
5Y*
19.67%
10Y*
16.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFRO vs. EKBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HFRO
Highland Funds I - Highland Opportunities and Income Fund
27.67%25.08%-27.17%-16.97%1.71%16.33%-8.42%4.22%-12.30%1.01%
EKBAX
Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund
38.34%21.87%21.75%22.23%-13.47%19.61%12.66%32.99%-5.55%0.08%

Correlation

The correlation between HFRO and EKBAX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFRO vs. EKBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFRO
HFRO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
HFRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
HFRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFRO Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

EKBAX
EKBAX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
EKBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EKBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
EKBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
EKBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
EKBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFRO vs. EKBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Highland Funds I - Highland Opportunities and Income Fund (HFRO) and Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HFROEKBAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.60

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

8.62

-5.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.12

33.61

-25.49

HFRO vs. EKBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFRO Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the EKBAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFRO and EKBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HFRO vs. EKBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFRO drawdown since its inception was -52.79%, smaller than the maximum EKBAX drawdown of -55.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFRO and EKBAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFROEKBAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.79%

-55.64%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.74%

-7.32%

-8.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.68%

-23.55%

-20.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.79%

-24.84%

-27.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.27%

0.00%

-14.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.65%

-7.97%

-12.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.49%

1.88%

+4.61%

Volatility

HFRO vs. EKBAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Highland Funds I - Highland Opportunities and Income Fund (HFRO) is 6.59%, while Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX) has a volatility of 9.31%. This indicates that HFRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EKBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFROEKBAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.59%

9.31%

-2.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.36%

14.86%

+0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.25%

18.23%

+3.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.45%

18.49%

+4.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.51%

17.76%

+4.75%

HFRO vs. EKBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFRO has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than EKBAX's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFRO vs. EKBAX - Dividend Comparison

HFRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.28%, less than EKBAX's 6.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EKBAX
Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund
6.95%9.61%5.28%6.16%12.50%6.89%2.03%9.49%7.14%6.20%10.05%11.47%
HFRO
Highland Funds I - Highland Opportunities and Income Fund
6.28%7.73%8.90%12.02%8.97%8.41%8.99%7.43%7.22%0.99%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFRO and EKBAX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EKBAX has higher volatility (9.31%) compared to HFRO (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFRO dropped -52.79% vs EKBAX's -55.64%.

EKBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.47 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFRO and EKBAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer