HFMF vs. GSST

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

HFMF (Unlimited HFMF Managed Futures ETF) and GSST (Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HFMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Unlimited, while GSST is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. HFMF charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for GSST.

Performance

HFMF vs. GSST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Unlimited HFMF Managed Futures ETF (HFMF) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFMF achieves a 3.80% return, which is significantly higher than GSST's 1.99% return.

HFMF

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -1.89%
• 6M: -0.94%
• YTD: 3.80%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GSST

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.33%
• 6M: 1.88%
• YTD: 1.99%
• 1Y: 4.43%
• 3Y*: 5.49%
• 5Y*: 3.83%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFMF vs. GSST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HFMF Unlimited HFMF Managed Futures ETF	3.80%	6.34%
GSST Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF	1.99%	2.38%

Correlation

The correlation between HFMF and GSST is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025	-0.09

Return for Risk

HFMF vs. GSST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFMF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GSST

GSST Risk / Return Rank: 99
GSST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
GSST Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
GSST Omega Ratio Rank: 99
GSST Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
GSST Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFMF vs. GSST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unlimited HFMF Managed Futures ETF (HFMF) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HFMF	GSST	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	7.73	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	16.00	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	3.79	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	29.06	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	179.36	—

Drawdowns

HFMF vs. GSST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFMF drawdown since its inception was -14.69%, which is greater than GSST's maximum drawdown of -3.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFMF and GSST.

Drawdown Indicators

	HFMF	GSST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.69%	-3.51%	-11.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.15%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.25%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-1.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.13%	0.00%	-13.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.85%	-0.16%	-3.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.02%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HFMF	GSST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.13%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.41%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.13%	0.58%	+15.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.13%	0.63%	+15.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.13%	0.86%	+15.27%

HFMF vs. GSST - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFMF has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than GSST's 0.16% expense ratio.

Dividends

HFMF vs. GSST - Dividend Comparison

HFMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, less than GSST's 4.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GSST Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF	4.30%	4.56%	5.45%	4.98%	1.97%	0.71%	1.12%	1.66%
HFMF Unlimited HFMF Managed Futures ETF	2.86%	2.97%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HFMF and GSST in my portfolio?

HFMF and GSST have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HFMF or GSST?

On fees, GSST is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HFMF or GSST?

GSST is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HFMF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HFMF or GSST?

GSST has the higher dividend yield at 4.30%, compared with 2.86% for HFMF.

What is the main difference between HFMF and GSST?

HFMF is categorized as Systematic Trend, while GSST is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Unlimited and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for HFMF and 0.16% for GSST.