HFMF vs. AHLT
HFMF (Unlimited HFMF Managed Futures ETF) and AHLT (American Beacon AHL Trend ETF) are both Systematic Trend funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HFMF charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for AHLT.
Performance
HFMF vs. AHLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HFMF achieves a 7.67% return, which is significantly lower than AHLT's 12.42% return.
HFMF
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -2.87%
- YTD
- 7.67%
- 6M
- 8.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AHLT
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 2.87%
- YTD
- 12.42%
- 6M
- 16.55%
- 1Y
- 37.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HFMF vs. AHLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HFMF Unlimited HFMF Managed Futures ETF | 7.67% | 6.34% |
AHLT American Beacon AHL Trend ETF | 12.42% | 19.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between HFMF and AHLT is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HFMF vs. AHLT — Risk / Return Rank
HFMF
AHLT
HFMF vs. AHLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unlimited HFMF Managed Futures ETF (HFMF) and American Beacon AHL Trend ETF (AHLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HFMF | AHLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.48 | +0.51 |
Drawdowns
HFMF vs. AHLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFMF drawdown since its inception was -10.00%, smaller than the maximum AHLT drawdown of -20.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFMF and AHLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFMF | AHLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.00% | -20.18% | +10.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.89% | -0.80% | -9.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.86% | -9.39% | +6.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.05% | — |
Volatility
HFMF vs. AHLT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HFMF | AHLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.12% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.79% | 17.10% | -0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.79% | 17.37% | -0.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.79% | 17.37% | -0.58% |
HFMF vs. AHLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFMF has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than AHLT's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
HFMF vs. AHLT - Dividend Comparison
HFMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than AHLT's 1.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AHLT American Beacon AHL Trend ETF | 1.51% | 1.70% | 0.00% | 3.72% |
HFMF Unlimited HFMF Managed Futures ETF | 2.76% | 2.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HFMF and AHLT have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AHLT is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AHLT is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HFMF.
HFMF has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 1.51% for AHLT.
They also come from different issuers: Unlimited and American Beacon. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for HFMF and 0.95% for AHLT.
Find the right allocation for HFMF and AHLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer