PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFGO vs. SGRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFGO vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFGO achieves a 11.58% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 51.46% return.


HFGO

1D
-1.26%
1M
8.28%
YTD
11.58%
6M
10.04%
1Y
30.26%
3Y*
26.77%
5Y*
10Y*

SGRT

1D
0.03%
1M
14.68%
YTD
51.46%
6M
56.17%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFGO vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HFGO
Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF
11.58%6.43%
SGRT
SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF
51.46%25.25%

Correlation

The correlation between HFGO and SGRT is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025

0.72

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFGO vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFGO
HFGO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
HFGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFGO Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
HFGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFGO Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

SGRT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFGO vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HFGOSGRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.35

HFGO vs. SGRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HFGOSGRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

3.81

-3.41

Drawdowns

HFGO vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFGO drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFGO and SGRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFGOSGRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.64%

-17.87%

-26.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

0.00%

-1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.11%

-3.11%

-13.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.67%

Volatility

HFGO vs. SGRT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFGOSGRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.01%

33.41%

-15.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.91%

33.41%

-7.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.91%

33.41%

-7.50%

HFGO vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFGO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFGO vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison

HFGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.


PositionTTM2025
HFGO
Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%
SGRT
SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF
0.11%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFGO and SGRT have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SGRT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SGRT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HFGO.

SGRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for HFGO.

Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HFGO and 0.59% for SGRT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFGO and SGRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer