PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFGO vs. ROSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HFGO vs. ROSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HFGO vs. ROSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HFGO
Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF
-10.55%15.52%40.73%42.45%-36.69%-5.15%
ROSC
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
3.15%10.18%7.28%18.88%-10.58%-1.87%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFGO achieves a -10.55% return, which is significantly lower than ROSC's 3.15% return.


HFGO

1D
4.54%
1M
-4.46%
YTD
-10.55%
6M
-9.96%
1Y
17.12%
3Y*
21.20%
5Y*
10Y*

ROSC

1D
1.33%
1M
-3.65%
YTD
3.15%
6M
7.48%
1Y
22.55%
3Y*
12.82%
5Y*
6.99%
10Y*
9.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HFGO vs. ROSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFGO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ROSC's 0.34% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HFGO vs. ROSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFGO
HFGO Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
HFGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFGO Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
HFGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFGO Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

ROSC
ROSC Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ROSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROSC Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
ROSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROSC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFGO vs. ROSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HFGOROSCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.70

1.17

-0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.16

1.77

-0.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.23

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

1.91

-0.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.10

7.26

-4.16

HFGO vs. ROSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFGO Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the ROSC Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFGO and ROSC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HFGOROSCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

1.17

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.43

-0.23

Correlation

The correlation between HFGO and ROSC is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

HFGO vs. ROSC - Dividend Comparison

HFGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ROSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFGO
Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ROSC
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
2.03%2.08%2.00%2.01%1.51%2.13%1.75%3.05%2.86%2.13%2.20%2.48%

Drawdowns

HFGO vs. ROSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFGO drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, roughly equal to the maximum ROSC drawdown of -43.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFGO and ROSC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HFGOROSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.64%

-43.13%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.29%

-11.91%

-6.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.59%

-5.31%

-9.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.62%

-7.31%

-9.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.51%

3.13%

+2.38%

Volatility

HFGO vs. ROSC - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO) has a higher volatility of 7.75% compared to Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) at 5.24%. This indicates that HFGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HFGOROSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.75%

5.24%

+2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.36%

11.14%

+3.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.53%

19.29%

+5.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.16%

19.41%

+6.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.16%

20.26%

+5.90%