PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFGO vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFGO vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HFGO having a 11.58% return and ITOT slightly lower at 11.25%.


HFGO

1D
-1.26%
1M
8.28%
YTD
11.58%
6M
10.04%
1Y
30.26%
3Y*
26.77%
5Y*
10Y*

ITOT

1D
-0.73%
1M
5.01%
YTD
11.25%
6M
11.12%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
22.09%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFGO vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HFGO
Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF
11.58%15.52%40.73%42.45%-36.69%-5.15%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
11.25%17.00%23.80%26.12%-19.47%1.08%

Correlation

The correlation between HFGO and ITOT is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2021

0.90

The correlation between HFGO and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

HFGO vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HFGO
ITOT

Technology

52.0%
33.8%

Communication Services

21.5%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.9%
10.1%

Healthcare

7.0%
9.0%

Industrials

3.1%
9.5%

Financial Services

2.3%
12.1%

Energy

0.6%
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

0.5%
4.7%

Basic Materials

-

2.1%

Real Estate

-

2.4%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Technology

HFGO
52.0%
ITOT
33.8%

Communication Services

HFGO
21.5%
ITOT
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

HFGO
12.9%
ITOT
10.1%

Healthcare

HFGO
7.0%
ITOT
9.0%

Industrials

HFGO
3.1%
ITOT
9.5%

Financial Services

HFGO
2.3%
ITOT
12.1%

Energy

HFGO
0.6%
ITOT
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

HFGO
0.5%
ITOT
4.7%

Basic Materials

HFGO

-

ITOT
2.1%

Real Estate

HFGO

-

ITOT
2.4%

Utilities

HFGO

-

ITOT
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFGO vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFGO
HFGO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
HFGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFGO Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
HFGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFGO Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFGO vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HFGOITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.42

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

3.17

-1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.35

14.57

-9.22

HFGO vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFGO Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFGO and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HFGOITOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

2.32

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.57

-0.18

Drawdowns

HFGO vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFGO drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFGO and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFGOITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.64%

-55.20%

+10.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.29%

-8.90%

-9.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.19%

-19.44%

-5.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-0.73%

-0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.11%

-6.97%

-9.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.67%

1.94%

+3.73%

Volatility

HFGO vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 2.99%. This indicates that HFGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFGOITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.77%

2.99%

+1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.91%

9.13%

+4.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.01%

12.20%

+5.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.91%

17.36%

+8.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.91%

18.26%

+7.65%

HFGO vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFGO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFGO vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

HFGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFGO
Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
0.98%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFGO and ITOT have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFGO has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to ITOT (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFGO dropped -44.64% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

On 3-year performance, HFGO leads with 26.77% vs 22.09% for ITOT. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HFGO has performed better with a 26.77% return vs 22.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HFGO.

ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for HFGO.

HFGO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HFGO and 0.03% for ITOT.

ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFGO and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer