HFGO vs. ITOT
HFGO (Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HFGO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Hartford, while ITOT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Total Market Index. HFGO is actively managed, while ITOT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HFGO returned 26.77%/yr vs 22.09%/yr for ITOT. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HFGO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ITOT.
Performance
HFGO vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HFGO having a 11.58% return and ITOT slightly lower at 11.25%.
HFGO
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- 8.28%
- YTD
- 11.58%
- 6M
- 10.04%
- 1Y
- 30.26%
- 3Y*
- 26.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITOT
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 11.25%
- 6M
- 11.12%
- 1Y
- 28.12%
- 3Y*
- 22.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.69%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
HFGO vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFGO Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF | 11.58% | 15.52% | 40.73% | 42.45% | -36.69% | -5.15% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 11.25% | 17.00% | 23.80% | 26.12% | -19.47% | 1.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between HFGO and ITOT is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2021 | 0.90 |
The correlation between HFGO and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
HFGO vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HFGO
ITOT
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
HFGO
ITOT
Communication Services
HFGO
ITOT
Consumer Cyclical
HFGO
ITOT
Healthcare
HFGO
ITOT
Industrials
HFGO
ITOT
Financial Services
HFGO
ITOT
Energy
HFGO
ITOT
Consumer Defensive
HFGO
ITOT
Basic Materials
HFGO
-
ITOT
Real Estate
HFGO
-
ITOT
Utilities
HFGO
-
ITOT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HFGO vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank
HFGO
ITOT
HFGO vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HFGO | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.42 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 3.17 | -1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.35 | 14.57 | -9.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HFGO | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | 2.32 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.57 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
HFGO vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFGO drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFGO and ITOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFGO | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.64% | -55.20% | +10.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.29% | -8.90% | -9.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.19% | -19.44% | -5.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -0.73% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.11% | -6.97% | -9.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.67% | 1.94% | +3.73% |
Volatility
HFGO vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison
Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 2.99%. This indicates that HFGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HFGO | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 2.99% | +1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.91% | 9.13% | +4.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.01% | 12.20% | +5.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.91% | 17.36% | +8.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.91% | 18.26% | +7.65% |
HFGO vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFGO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
HFGO vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison
HFGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFGO Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 0.98% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HFGO and ITOT have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HFGO has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to ITOT (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFGO dropped -44.64% vs ITOT's -55.20%.
On 3-year performance, HFGO leads with 26.77% vs 22.09% for ITOT. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HFGO has performed better with a 26.77% return vs 22.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HFGO.
ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for HFGO.
HFGO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HFGO and 0.03% for ITOT.
ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HFGO and ITOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer