HFGO vs. HMOP
HFGO (Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF) and HMOP (Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HFGO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Hartford, while HMOP is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Hartford. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HFGO returned 26.77%/yr vs 4.61%/yr for HMOP. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HFGO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for HMOP.
Performance
HFGO vs. HMOP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HFGO achieves a 11.58% return, which is significantly higher than HMOP's 1.60% return.
HFGO
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- 8.28%
- YTD
- 11.58%
- 6M
- 10.04%
- 1Y
- 30.26%
- 3Y*
- 26.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HMOP
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 6.92%
- 3Y*
- 4.61%
- 5Y*
- 1.40%
- 10Y*
- —
HFGO vs. HMOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFGO Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF | 11.58% | 15.52% | 40.73% | 42.45% | -36.69% | -5.15% |
HMOP Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF | 1.60% | 4.70% | 2.52% | 6.83% | -8.37% | 0.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between HFGO and HMOP is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2021 | 0.13 |
The correlation between HFGO and HMOP shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HFGO vs. HMOP — Risk / Return Rank
HFGO
HMOP
HFGO vs. HMOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO) and Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF (HMOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HFGO | HMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.53 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 2.57 | -0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.35 | 8.36 | -3.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HFGO | HMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | 2.56 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.64 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
HFGO vs. HMOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFGO drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, which is greater than HMOP's maximum drawdown of -13.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFGO and HMOP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFGO | HMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.64% | -13.12% | -31.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.29% | -2.70% | -15.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.19% | -4.81% | -20.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -0.71% | -0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.11% | -2.47% | -13.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.67% | 0.83% | +4.84% |
Volatility
HFGO vs. HMOP - Volatility Comparison
Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF (HMOP) at 0.77%. This indicates that HFGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HMOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HFGO | HMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 0.77% | +4.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.91% | 1.78% | +12.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.01% | 2.71% | +15.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.91% | 3.86% | +22.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.91% | 4.26% | +21.65% |
HFGO vs. HMOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFGO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than HMOP's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
HFGO vs. HMOP - Dividend Comparison
HFGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HMOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFGO Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HMOP Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF | 3.45% | 3.40% | 3.22% | 2.92% | 2.12% | 1.67% | 5.26% | 2.87% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HFGO and HMOP have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HFGO has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to HMOP (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFGO dropped -44.64% vs HMOP's -13.12%.
On 3-year performance, HFGO leads with 26.77% vs 4.61% for HMOP. On fees, HMOP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, HMOP has been the lower-risk option at 0.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HFGO has performed better with a 26.77% return vs 4.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HMOP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HFGO.
HMOP has the higher dividend yield at 3.45%, compared with 0.00% for HFGO.
HFGO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while HMOP is Municipal Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HFGO and 0.29% for HMOP.
HMOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HFGO and HMOP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer