HFGO vs. FFOG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HFGO (Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF) and FFOG (Franklin Focused Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HFGO returned 30.26% vs 23.96% for FFOG. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HFGO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for FFOG.

Performance

HFGO vs. FFOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO) and Franklin Focused Growth ETF (FFOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFGO achieves a 11.58% return, which is significantly higher than FFOG's 10.66% return.

HFGO

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: 8.28%
• YTD: 11.58%
• 6M: 10.04%
• 1Y: 30.26%
• 3Y*: 26.77%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FFOG

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 5.98%
• YTD: 10.66%
• 6M: 9.70%
• 1Y: 23.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFGO vs. FFOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HFGO Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF	11.58%	15.52%	40.73%	11.78%
FFOG Franklin Focused Growth ETF	10.66%	17.09%	38.20%	12.41%

Correlation

The correlation between HFGO and FFOG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023	0.95

The correlation between HFGO and FFOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

HFGO vs. FFOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HFGO	FFOG
Technology	52.0%	56.0%
Communication Services	21.5%	13.5%
Consumer Cyclical	12.9%	13.7%
Healthcare	7.0%	5.7%
Industrials	3.1%	4.9%
Financial Services	2.3%	2.1%
Energy	0.6%	0.7%
Consumer Defensive	0.5%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

HFGO vs. FFOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFGO

HFGO Risk / Return Rank: 42
HFGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
HFGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
HFGO Omega Ratio Rank: 46
HFGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
HFGO Martin Ratio Rank: 35

FFOG

FFOG Risk / Return Rank: 29
FFOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FFOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FFOG Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FFOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
FFOG Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFGO vs. FFOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO) and Franklin Focused Growth ETF (FFOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HFGO	FFOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	1.20	+0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	1.67	+0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.21	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.66	1.10	+0.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.35	3.25	+2.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HFGO vs. FFOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFGO Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the FFOG Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFGO and FFOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HFGO	FFOG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.69	1.20	+0.49
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	1.32	-0.93

Drawdowns

HFGO vs. FFOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFGO drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, which is greater than FFOG's maximum drawdown of -25.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFGO and FFOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	HFGO	FFOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.64%	-25.38%	-19.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.29%	-21.90%	+3.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.36%	-0.97%	-0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.11%	-4.59%	-11.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.67%	7.39%	-1.72%

Volatility

HFGO vs. FFOG - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO) and Franklin Focused Growth ETF (FFOG) have volatilities of 4.77% and 4.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HFGO	FFOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.77%	4.75%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.91%	15.44%	-1.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.01%	20.03%	-2.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.91%	23.79%	+2.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.91%	23.79%	+2.12%

HFGO vs. FFOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFGO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FFOG's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

HFGO vs. FFOG - Dividend Comparison

Neither HFGO nor FFOG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HFGO and FFOG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, HFGO and FFOG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, HFGO or FFOG?

HFGO has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to FFOG (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFGO dropped -44.64% vs FFOG's -25.38%.

Which ETF is better, HFGO or FFOG?

On 1-year performance, HFGO leads with 30.26% vs 23.96% for FFOG. On fees, FFOG is cheaper at 0.55% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HFGO or FFOG?

Over the 1-year period, HFGO has performed better with a 30.26% return vs 23.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HFGO or FFOG?

FFOG is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HFGO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HFGO or FFOG?

HFGO and FFOG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between HFGO and FFOG?

They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HFGO and 0.55% for FFOG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HFGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.