HFGM vs. RSST

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

HFGM (Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF) and RSST (Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HFGM is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Unlimited, while RSST is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Return Stacked. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HFGM returned 23.69% vs 47.14% for RSST. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HFGM charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for RSST.

Performance

HFGM vs. RSST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF (HFGM) and Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFGM achieves a 5.58% return, which is significantly lower than RSST's 14.96% return.

HFGM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.35%
• 6M: -6.05%
• YTD: 5.58%
• 1Y: 23.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 25.39%

RSST

• 1D: 1.26%
• 1M: 1.13%
• 6M: 10.06%
• YTD: 14.96%
• 1Y: 47.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HFGM Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF	$1.39M	$1.17M	$1.73M
RSST Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF	$2.69M	$3.70M	$3.80M

HFGM vs. RSST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HFGM Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF	5.58%	26.88%
RSST Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF	14.96%	43.50%

Correlation

The correlation between HFGM and RSST is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2025	0.75

The correlation between HFGM and RSST has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HFGM vs. RSST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HFGM

HFGM Risk / Return Rank: 39
HFGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
HFGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
HFGM Omega Ratio Rank: 39
HFGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
HFGM Martin Ratio Rank: 37

RSST

RSST Risk / Return Rank: 78
RSST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
RSST Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
RSST Omega Ratio Rank: 75
RSST Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
RSST Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HFGM vs. RSST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF (HFGM) and Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HFGM	RSST	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.99	1.78	-0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	2.22	-0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.31	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.54	3.53	-1.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.83	10.47	-6.65

HFGM vs. RSST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFGM Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the RSST Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFGM and RSST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HFGM vs. RSST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFGM drawdown since its inception was -15.09%, smaller than the maximum RSST drawdown of -30.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFGM and RSST.

Drawdown Indicators

	HFGM	RSST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.09%	-30.80%	+15.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.09%	-11.71%	-3.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.00%	-6.24%	-6.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.75%	-6.02%	+2.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.05%	3.95%	+2.10%

Volatility

HFGM vs. RSST - Volatility Comparison

Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF (HFGM) has a higher volatility of 5.37% compared to Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) at 4.47%. This indicates that HFGM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HFGM	RSST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.37%	4.47%	+0.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.11%	16.48%	+0.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.52%	23.27%	+0.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.66%	24.24%	-2.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.66%	24.24%	-2.58%

HFGM vs. RSST - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFGM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than RSST's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

HFGM vs. RSST - Dividend Comparison

HFGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.64%, more than RSST's 0.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
HFGM Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF	10.64%	11.23%	0.00%	0.00%
RSST Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF	0.98%	1.12%	0.09%	0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HFGM and RSST in my portfolio?

HFGM and RSST have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HFGM or RSST?

HFGM has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to RSST (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFGM dropped -15.09% vs RSST's -30.80%.

Which ETF is better, HFGM or RSST?

On 1-year performance, RSST leads with 47.14% vs 23.69% for HFGM. On fees, HFGM is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, RSST has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HFGM or RSST?

Over the 1-year period, RSST has performed better with a 47.14% return vs 23.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HFGM or RSST?

HFGM is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RSST.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HFGM or RSST?

HFGM has the higher dividend yield at 10.64%, compared with 0.98% for RSST.

What is the main difference between HFGM and RSST?

HFGM is categorized as Long-Short, while RSST is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Unlimited and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for HFGM and 0.99% for RSST.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.