PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFGM vs. MMKT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFGM vs. MMKT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF (HFGM) and Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFGM achieves a 14.95% return, which is significantly higher than MMKT's 1.44% return.


HFGM

1D
-1.51%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
14.95%
6M
14.19%
1Y
39.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MMKT

1D
0.01%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.44%
6M
1.76%
1Y
3.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFGM vs. MMKT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HFGM and MMKT is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2025

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFGM vs. MMKT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFGM
HFGM Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
HFGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFGM Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
HFGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFGM Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

MMKT
MMKT Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
MMKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMKT Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
MMKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMKT Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFGM vs. MMKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF (HFGM) and Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HFGMMMKTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-14.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-60.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

15.14

-13.83

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

153.44

-149.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.95

910.67

-900.72

HFGM vs. MMKT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFGM Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is lower than the MMKT Sharpe Ratio of 16.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFGM and MMKT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HFGMMMKTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

16.49

-14.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.82

17.60

-15.78

Drawdowns

HFGM vs. MMKT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFGM drawdown since its inception was -10.66%, which is greater than MMKT's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFGM and MMKT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFGMMMKTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.66%

-0.04%

-10.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.66%

-0.02%

-10.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.28%

0.00%

-5.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.68%

-0.00%

-2.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.95%

0.00%

+3.95%

Volatility

HFGM vs. MMKT - Volatility Comparison

Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF (HFGM) has a higher volatility of 4.40% compared to Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) at 0.05%. This indicates that HFGM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMKT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFGMMMKTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

0.05%

+4.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.41%

0.13%

+17.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.55%

0.23%

+22.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.75%

0.23%

+21.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.75%

0.23%

+21.52%

HFGM vs. MMKT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFGM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MMKT's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFGM vs. MMKT - Dividend Comparison

HFGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.77%, more than MMKT's 3.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
HFGM
Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF
9.77%11.23%0.00%
MMKT
Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF
3.73%3.98%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFGM and MMKT have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFGM has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to MMKT (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFGM dropped -10.66% vs MMKT's -0.04%.

On 1-year performance, HFGM leads with 39.23% vs 3.81% for MMKT. On fees, MMKT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, MMKT has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HFGM has performed better with a 39.23% return vs 3.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MMKT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for HFGM.

HFGM has the higher dividend yield at 9.77%, compared with 3.73% for MMKT.

HFGM is categorized as Macro Trading, while MMKT is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: Unlimited and Texas Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for HFGM and 0.20% for MMKT.

MMKT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.49 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFGM and MMKT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer