HFGM vs. MMKT
HFGM (Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF) and MMKT (Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HFGM is a Macro Trading fund actively managed by Unlimited, while MMKT is a Money Market fund actively managed by Texas Capital. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HFGM returned 39.23% vs 3.81% for MMKT. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. HFGM charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for MMKT.
Performance
HFGM vs. MMKT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HFGM achieves a 14.95% return, which is significantly higher than MMKT's 1.44% return.
HFGM
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 14.95%
- 6M
- 14.19%
- 1Y
- 39.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MMKT
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 3.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HFGM vs. MMKT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HFGM Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF | 14.95% | 26.63% |
MMKT Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF | 1.44% | 2.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between HFGM and MMKT is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2025 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HFGM vs. MMKT — Risk / Return Rank
HFGM
MMKT
HFGM vs. MMKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF (HFGM) and Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HFGM | MMKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -14.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -60.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 15.14 | -13.83 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 153.44 | -149.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.95 | 910.67 | -900.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HFGM | MMKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 16.49 | -14.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.82 | 17.60 | -15.78 |
Drawdowns
HFGM vs. MMKT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFGM drawdown since its inception was -10.66%, which is greater than MMKT's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFGM and MMKT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFGM | MMKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.66% | -0.04% | -10.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.66% | -0.02% | -10.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.28% | 0.00% | -5.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.68% | -0.00% | -2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.95% | 0.00% | +3.95% |
Volatility
HFGM vs. MMKT - Volatility Comparison
Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF (HFGM) has a higher volatility of 4.40% compared to Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) at 0.05%. This indicates that HFGM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMKT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HFGM | MMKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.40% | 0.05% | +4.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.41% | 0.13% | +17.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.55% | 0.23% | +22.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.75% | 0.23% | +21.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.75% | 0.23% | +21.52% |
HFGM vs. MMKT - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFGM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MMKT's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
HFGM vs. MMKT - Dividend Comparison
HFGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.77%, more than MMKT's 3.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HFGM Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF | 9.77% | 11.23% | 0.00% |
MMKT Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF | 3.73% | 3.98% | 1.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HFGM and MMKT have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HFGM has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to MMKT (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFGM dropped -10.66% vs MMKT's -0.04%.
On 1-year performance, HFGM leads with 39.23% vs 3.81% for MMKT. On fees, MMKT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, MMKT has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HFGM has performed better with a 39.23% return vs 3.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MMKT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for HFGM.
HFGM has the higher dividend yield at 9.77%, compared with 3.73% for MMKT.
HFGM is categorized as Macro Trading, while MMKT is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: Unlimited and Texas Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for HFGM and 0.20% for MMKT.
MMKT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.49 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HFGM and MMKT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer