HFCVX vs. HFCSX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

HFCVX (Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund) and HFCSX (Hennessy Focus Fund) are both mutual funds - HFCVX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Hennessy, while HFCSX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Hennessy. Over the past 10 years, HFCVX returned 11.20%/yr vs 11.44%/yr for HFCSX. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HFCVX charges 1.23%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for HFCSX.

Performance

HFCVX vs. HFCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX) and Hennessy Focus Fund (HFCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFCVX achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly higher than HFCSX's 2.85% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HFCVX having a 11.20% annualized return and HFCSX not far ahead at 11.44%.

HFCVX

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: -2.52%
• YTD: 11.32%
• 6M: 10.92%
• 1Y: 22.23%
• 3Y*: 15.60%
• 5Y*: 11.55%
• 10Y*: 11.20%

HFCSX

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: -8.44%
• YTD: 2.85%
• 6M: 0.72%
• 1Y: 15.23%
• 3Y*: 18.22%
• 5Y*: 8.31%
• 10Y*: 11.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFCVX vs. HFCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HFCVX Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund	11.32%	18.27%	9.59%	5.81%	6.12%	29.94%	-6.39%	20.84%	-9.50%	19.21%
HFCSX Hennessy Focus Fund	2.85%	28.30%	14.67%	20.99%	-24.92%	32.04%	5.47%	34.96%	-10.93%	19.27%

Correlation

The correlation between HFCVX and HFCSX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1998	0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between HFCVX and HFCSX has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

HFCVX vs. HFCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFCVX

HFCVX Risk / Return Rank: 85
HFCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
HFCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
HFCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
HFCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
HFCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

HFCSX

HFCSX Risk / Return Rank: 8
HFCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
HFCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
HFCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
HFCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
HFCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFCVX vs. HFCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX) and Hennessy Focus Fund (HFCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HFCVX	HFCSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	0.42	+1.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.27	0.81	+2.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.09	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.73	0.62	+5.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.31	1.40	+14.91

HFCVX vs. HFCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFCVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the HFCSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFCVX and HFCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HFCVX vs. HFCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFCVX drawdown since its inception was -65.75%, which is greater than HFCSX's maximum drawdown of -59.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFCVX and HFCSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HFCVX	HFCSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.75%	-59.41%	-6.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.77%	-19.90%	+16.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.32%	-23.02%	+11.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.81%	-33.13%	+16.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.39%	-47.07%	+7.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.35%	-11.54%	+8.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.22%	-9.85%	+1.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.32%	8.88%	-7.56%

Volatility

HFCVX vs. HFCSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX) is 3.14%, while Hennessy Focus Fund (HFCSX) has a volatility of 10.84%. This indicates that HFCVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HFCVX	HFCSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.14%	10.84%	-7.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.07%	21.28%	-14.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.43%	29.36%	-19.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.24%	23.09%	-9.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.40%	22.73%	-6.33%

HFCVX vs. HFCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFCVX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is lower than HFCSX's 1.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

HFCVX vs. HFCSX - Dividend Comparison

HFCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%, less than HFCSX's 47.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HFCSX Hennessy Focus Fund	47.12%	48.46%	15.94%	24.51%	15.15%	17.19%	35.80%	10.78%	22.20%	0.01%	0.00%	0.20%
HFCVX Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund	6.64%	7.39%	4.56%	3.57%	10.33%	4.81%	2.58%	6.58%	17.16%	14.97%	2.26%	2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HFCVX and HFCSX in my portfolio?

HFCVX and HFCSX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HFCVX or HFCSX?

HFCSX has higher volatility (10.84%) compared to HFCVX (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFCVX dropped -65.75% vs HFCSX's -59.41%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HFCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.